About Me

Name: Jesse "The Mind"...
Email: jno2179536@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE

The four horsemen of the Apocalypse is one of the most intriguing tales of the Bible. Each rider of the horse brings about a plague that is designed to make it difficult for men. Prideful men. Things to humble men down from their self-imposed pedestals. Men, fools and teachers alike wonder aloud “why would a good God let this happen?” The answer is beyond their comprehension at least at this point in this age’s history. At the blowing of the seventh trump, they will have their answer. All of God’s mysteries will be revealed and the spirit of slumber upon them will be lifted. Until then, it is not for anyone but the election of grace to know. They do not have the spirit of slumber. I will say this though, our souls are much older than our bodies. This Earth despite what your teachers have told you is much older than several thousand years old. This age is several thousand years old. Not the world. If you trace what is written in the NT back to the original Greek, you would see that this is an age we’re living in. There will be another age after this one. That's where Jesus reigns upon Earth with his saints while Satan is in the bottomless pit. Being that our souls are much older than our human bodies, there are things our creation may have done beforehand that God found disgraceful. Just because we are not allowed to remember, it doesn't mean it never happened. That’s how God chose certain people to be his prophets. As God told Jeremiah, “I knew you before you were in your mother’s womb”. There must have been a reason why God chose Jeremiah and other prophets to be His prophets. God would not create a soul and say at random “okay, you’re going to be my prophet”. God didn't send one of these prophets to live at random either. They all had their own time to be put here in this sinful, human flesh to serve God by guiding men to Him. There are things at work here that will be revealed, perhaps in this very generation itself. The tribulation period is the culmination of this age.

The rider of the first horse of the Apocalypse is riding a white horse. His power was to be able to conquer much of Earth. The color of the horse being white is significant because this is the Antichrist who will be as Christ coming in riding on a white horse. The Antichrist will conquer the world to be his one world government. We’re closer to that now than anyone might think. With the recent economic collapses revealing the vulnerabilities of the global economy, it goes to show our economies are already tied to one another. With Obama's rise to power and the adoration he's received from the spiritually empty, that also goes to show how vulnerable people are to following someone with some charisma. The Antichrist will have much more charisma than Obama and won't need to use the words "hope, change, shooting stars, purple horseshoes, rainbows, and lucky charms" to inspire the masses. The cult of the spiritual empty who look down on religion and religious people have proven that they are very receptive to having a god, too.

The rider of the red horse is next, and his power was to take peace from the Earth. Again, we’re right at the door of this possibly happening. Iran is close to having a nuclear bomb to which Israel cannot let them have. Israel as they have done in times past will see to it that this does not come to pass. Iran has the backing of many countries which are not coincidentally the same countries listed as the ones written in the Bible that will come against Israel. The Arab World, Russia, China, and others will be among these nations. Right now a snapping of a twig can send this world into a world war. Even nonbelievers can see this as a possibility. You have the situation inside Iran, the tensions between Iran and Israel, India and Pakistan, North Korea and nearly everyone else. One casted stone can send this entire world into war.

The rider of the black horse is more difficult to understand than the others. He was given a pair of balances. There was a voice that said “a measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.” As most know, this is a plague on the economy. What is a bit of a mystery is how specific this plague really is and it goes to show how subtle some of God’s words really are. One part is that the oil and the wine aren’t actually oil and wine at all. If there is a great plague upon the economy, of course oil and wine would be hurt. There is no way oil or wine itself won't be hurt in a bad economy, so you have to ask yourself what that must mean. What do you do with oil besides cook with it? You anoint with it. Wine is fermented grape juice, but during fermentation impurities come out of the grape juice. Wine is pure and fermented grape juice. What that really says is “don’t hurt the anointed and the pure”. To prove this contention, Psalm 105:15 says “touch not mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm.” Exactly what my interpretation of Revelation 4:6 is. It’s either that or that the price of oil and wine will not go up when everything else does. You be the judge. Two, specifically one measure of wheat and three measures of barley make up a good sized loaf of bread. You can make two decent sized loaves of bread. It says that each a measure of wheat and three measures of barley are a penny. What is a penny according to what is written? The answer is in Matthew chapter 20. Just about all of that chapter is a parable from Christ which means that it doesn’t matter when a person comes to Christ in their life. That they will receive the same things a person will receive if they came to Christ early in their lives. Hidden in that parable is what a penny is. The man who owned the land offered men to work in his field a penny for a day’s work. That seems so innocent there and one would just blow by it except for one of the elect. A penny represents a lower class working man’s daily wage. This clarifies the economic plague of the black horse making it mean it would take a blue collar working man’s daily wage to be able to buy a loaf or so of bread. If that seems far-fetched as how there could be a plague so strong, one must be a student of history. In Russia shortly before and after communism fell, people lined up in the streets to pay $20 for a loaf of bread. I remember bread being mentioned specifically in those old news stories. This will be a plague of great economic woe and will give power to the one who has “the solution”.

The rider of the last horse rides a pale horse. The worst of all of the horsemen. The rider of the pale horse had Hell follow with him. His name was Death. This is no longer the Antichrist as a human being anymore, but Satan being kicked down to Earth himself. Halfway through the tribulation period, the Antichrist will die. He will seemingly rise again, but this time what this world will see is not a human being with the spirit of Satan inside him. It will be Satan himself in the flesh. Satan is Death, and Hell will follow him. Satan will make war with Israel and the nations aligned with Israel. War, hunger, and pestilences will kill a fourth part of the Earth. Pestilence isn’t written there specifically, but among the things described by Jesus in Matthew 24 and other gospels when he describes the end times says that there will be many pestilences. We’ve had SARS, swine flu, and the bird flu threaten to take many people for the last several years now. An outbreak of either or something new would do great damage. AIDS already has taken many, and continues to be the biggest threat to the people of Africa.

These plagues are frightening to say the least, but if this is the generation to see it then it has a lot of work to do. This is the most selfish and lost generation in this age’s history. So many do not believe and belittle things that are of God. Many who do believe don’t fully believe what is written. “It’s all in the interpretation” I’ve heard many times. That’s such a lazy thought to have. Of course it’s in the interpretation, but God’s word is GOD’S WORD. Not man’s. Trace things back to the original languages of Hebrew and Greek. Those are God’s words written in its original form. The King James is man’s translation of God’s word. As good as it is, there are mistranslations. Read it with a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance which will trace back for you what is originally written in the Hebrew for the OT and the Greek for the NT. People will survive to the end, then among them they will be divided to the left and right of Jesus. The faithful from those who made the wrong choice. Get ready. Prepare yourselves. We are at the door.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHRIST'S LAST MOMENTS ON THE CROSS

One of the more puzzling things written in the Bible are during Christ’s last moments when he said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” For some reason the traditional explanation is that this was Christ’s moment of doubt and pain. If that were the case, then he would have sinned. To accuse God of forsaking them is a sin for anyone. I know some will say “Jesus couldn’t sin”, but that’s foolish. That’s also shortchanging his painstaking life and death to say that he didn’t have the ability to sin. To pay such a heavy price of the sins of our creation, it wouldn’t be right if God cheated and made it to where his Messiah didn’t have the ability to sin. Plus, Satan did tempt Jesus in the desert. Why tempt someone that didn’t have the ability to sin? Why would Satan waste his breath? Satan knew exactly who Jesus was and knew he had the ability to sin. How many of you has he come to and offered all of the kingdoms of the world to? None.

So why wasn’t what Jesus said on the cross a sin? The genius of what Jesus was referring to is beyond amazing. Jesus saying "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" was designed to make a wise person ask why that wasn't a sin. As long as they aren’t too influenced by the traditional teaching of men, the question is designed to make them hunt for the answer. He wasn't talking to God, and I'll prove it. “He said ‘my God, why hast thou forsaken me”, so of course he was talking to God.” Well, actually that isn’t the case at all.

What Jesus did by saying that on the cross was to fulfill scripture. What scripture? Psalm 22. Psalm 22 starts off by saying “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” It’s been there the whole time. Read that psalm down to verse 16 and it says “For dogs have compassed me, the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me; they pierced my hands and my feet.” That is how Christ died. He had his hands and feet pierced, did he not? When were the psalms written? Most, if not all of the psalms were written by King David around 1000 BC. This was written a thousand years before Christ was on the cross. What is more amazing is when you really analyze that whole thing, the Jews knew nothing of crucifixion until the Romans came in 76 BC. This was written around nine hundred years before that. Psalm 22 is obviously the prophecy of the Messiah’s last moments. Only the truly blind will say it is not after reading it, which I had one try to tell me not too long ago, but that was more like a man that would not admit he's wrong. The willfully blind.

Why Jesus didn’t sin when he said that on the cross was because he wasn’t talking to God at all. He was fulfilling scripture. He was saying Psalm 22 is him. That shows how genius Psalm 22 even is. It’s supposed to, when Jesus repeats it on the cross, make us ask “why wasn’t that a sin?” So it’s up to us to find the answer somewhere.

Not only does it prove Jesus was the Messiah, to which no decent explanation by an atheist can come up with as a counter, but it also brings the Old and the New Testaments together. It proves there must be a prophetic author. It proves that both books are written by God through the Holy Spirit and out of His elect. Just by that psalm and what Jesus said on the cross proves all of these things beyond any skeptic’s analytical power attempting to tear it down. They can’t do it. Point this out to them and see if they can. Watch them scramble and struggle to find an answer for this. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE AUTHENTIC BIBLICAL HISTORY OF SATAN

Some people hear “Lucifer” and “Satan” and just think those are the names of the devil and don’t even question why. There is a huge difference between the two names and when they were his names. When taking all of this in with the meaning of his names, it can provide you a whole lot of wisdom about not just him, but about us and why we are here. That’s a trip for you to take if you decide to though. I cannot go any further than where this post ends.

In the KJV and other translated versions of the Bible, for some reason they mistranslated the word "Lucifer". Lucifer in the Hebrew is actually Helel (hay-LALE). If you open a Hebrew OT, it would read in the Hebrew "Helel", not Lucifer. The definition of it is “morning star”. Only one time does the Bible mention the word Helel, or “Lucifer”. That is in Isaiah 14:12. There’s a reason for that. It mentions what Helel’s crime was, in which he was banished from God and sentenced to everlasting torture. It says Helel exalted himself above all of the other stars of God and tried to be the god of the congregation. Helel was Satan’s name before he committed his crime.

Satan in the Hebrew means “the opponent” or “adversary”. There’s a reason for that too. Satan is what he became after his crime. He was the morning star, and now he’s the adversary. Since the days of Adam, he has been known as Satan. The reason why he’s mentioned as Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12 is because that’s what he was known as when he committed this crime. Since the days of Adam, Satan has been the adversary. People don’t trace back what is written in Revelation 20:2 back to the serpent written of in Genesis with Adam and Eve. “And he laid hold on the dragon, THAT OLD SERPENT, which is the devil and Satan and bound him for a thousand years.” What was John of Patmos referring to?

Ba’al was a fertility god of the pagans, but was he more than that? In Elijah’s time, Ba’al was the great opponent god and Jezebel was the chief pagan prophetess. As Paul reiterates the conversation between Elijah and God in Romans 11, he adds something that really puts traditional teaching into question. As is written, God tells Elijah “I have reserved to myself 7000 men who have not bowed the knee to Ba’al.” Traditional teachers have said that God meant there were 7000 people living in Israel who did not bow the knee to this pagan god. That’s wrong. If God reserves to himself a person, it means that that particular person has not lived yet. Proof of that is what Paul said afterward. “Even so at this present time there is also a remnant according to the election of grace.” A remnant. That means there are still some left. Elijah lived around 900 BC. Paul wrote this around 900 years afterward. There couldn’t be any living still if the traditional teachers are correct. God reserves to himself a person by not letting them live. In that particular conversation God meant that He has reserved to Himself 7000 men (and women) for the last generation. When else? Another secret to all of this is what Ba’al truly was. Ba’al may have been the pagan god of fertility, but he was also the deity of Venus. Lucifer means the morning star. What is the morning star? Venus is. Take it from there. I cannot go any further. I wish you luck.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PATTING MYSELF ON THE BACK

With the still, yet, forever moving attacks upon Sarah Palin and her family, I am reminded of a blog I wrote early after she was nominated McCain's VP. I love make predictions, particularly because I'm good at them. I know people. I accept them for what they are and that's it. I'm honest with myself at what I see. I knew this attack on Palin wouldn't stop on election day. Here is the full blog I wrote on September 6th, 2008. She was nominated August 29th...
 
"Palin Makes Media Show Their Hand"
 
From the beginning of Palin's rise from anonymity a week ago, the media has done more vetting of her and her family than they have Barack Obama in two years. It's not just the news media, but the celebrity news media as well. On the cover of Us Weekly they have a picture of Palin with her infant, Down's Syndrome son with the caption "Babies, Lies, and Scandal". Contrast that with a recent cover of Us Weekly with Barack and Michelle Obama which the caption says "Why He Loves Her". Awwww how cute. In the Palin issue, they bring up that her husband had a DUI charge. They didn't mention it was from twenty-two years ago. They have never mentioned that Barack Obama twenty years ago was snorting cocaine. Hmm. Us Weekly said the "lies" in the caption meant the lies told about Palin. Well there's a lie right there, speaking of lies. Just earlier tonight on CNN they interviewed Palin's ex-brother in law cop that tazered an 11 year old that she fired. They have never interviewed Jeremiah Wright or William Ayers. They won't either. Maybe after the election they will. They can't get in their Obamessiah's way of winning.
 
Now anyone with a fair mind knows the media is jumping all over this woman and why. She's a threat in every way to them. She galvanized the conservatives behind McCain. That's "uh-oh" number one. She is attractive, charismatic, strong, and knows how to handle herself. She's a mother of five children. She speaks as well as their Obamessiah can, and she doesn't need to talk about hope, change, shooting stars, rainbows, or lucky charms to inspire people. She was a surprise. They didn't see her coming. She has a compelling story in her rise to power. She shows great credibitlity in her handling of scandalous politicians and oil companies. All of this and she's a conservative?! That can't be! She hunts?! She kept her baby after knowing he would have Down's Syndrome?! She's not pro-choice?! She is as alien to these jerks as Yoda. It's not just that she's a threat to Obama's chance of winning. She's a threat to the entire progressive movement. This is a young, very attractive woman that gives women in middle America an identity. She is a threat to their way of living from their perspective, and I'm not overstating that at all. She must be torn down for the good of all progressives.
 
Close your eyes and picture this woman is a liberal. Maybe even aborting that poor baby. She'd be a hero to the left. They would talk of her bravery of going against men in her rise to power. You think Hillary is loved by women? Imagine if Palin was a liberal. The media would be all over her, and any criticism of her would be dealt with harshly. Anyone that denies that cannot cast a stone and hit reality from where they are. In a week we all know about her and her family. Her pregnant seventeen year old daughter. We know less about Barack Obama somehow. He has busted his butt to stay ambiguous, and the media is all too happy to oblige. He's barely been asked about his friendship to domestic terrorist William Ayers and Bernardine Doehrn. Ayers has admitted to bombing the Capitol Building, NYPD Headquarters, the Pentagon, and military recruitment offices. Only reason why he got off with it was because this spoiled brat was helped by his rich Commonwealth Edison big whig father and hot shot lawyers. Ayers has said the only thing he regrets is that he didn't go far enough. He can be seen stomping on the American flag in Chicago Magazine. Obama purposely sought this man out to get started in Chicago politics because Ayers in the twisted world of Chicago is "connected". Obama's explanation? "I was eight years old when he did this." This is the best this man can come up with and he could very well become President of the United States. Where are those Ayers interviews? Where is Jeremiah Wright? The media answers "all of our people are on the Palin story".
 
 
 
Damn, I am good eh?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE RISE AND POSSIBLE TAKEDOWN OF THE GREAT ALINSKYITE

                                                                                        "PUT ON THE EFFIN' GLASSES!"
 
Sorry for such a long period of time between posts and lack of comments on your posts recently, but haven't been on the puter for a LONG time. Don't worry though. The "Mind" is back in full effect. I was watching one of my favorite movies here recently, and it so reminded me of what is going on right now. The movie was "They Live" which starred Rowdy Roddy Piper and Keith David. It was about a secret alien invasion which went under the noses of unsuspecting Americans. The aliens were camoflauged by a signal beaming down from a satellite dish atop of a media building (perhaps just a coincidence). The only way to see the aliens for who they were was to put on some special shades which showed the aliens for who they really were. Ugly invaders of America. Piper's character tried to convince David's character to put on the glasses to see what he had been blinded to. What ensued was the best fighting scene in movie history, but eventually Keith David put on the glasses. On a side note, Keith David is one of my favorite actors. Very underrated. The mind boggling part of the movie was that it was actually written to talk about conservatives and how their way is invading the conscience of America without America knowing. I know. That is one for the Bizarro World.

 
I've been doing some reading lately. Yes, I can read. You didn't know that? Well barely. I've been reading an important book according to Obama. Saul Alinsky's now infamous book "Rules For Radicals" is a model on how to be a dictator. It's not about left-wing radical ideas. It's simply about pushing forth an agenda to accumulate power. Anything goes in this quest for power, especially throwing allies under the bus. Even their positions under the bus. It's all about obtaining power to the point it will not be lost. I knew Obama's affinity for Alinksy's book, but until I started reading it I didn't fully understand Obama's end game. Obama taught Alinsky's book in his class. Obama said of this book that it was better than any class he ever took at Harvard. Recent discussions on conservative-friendly outlets are looking more in Obama's actions and how they form fit to Alinsky's suggestions in his book. While they were talking about Reverend Wright and William Ayers to no end during the long, long campaign, these pundits all but ignored Alinsky. I railed on about Obama's associations as well, but I never left out Alinsky or Rashid Khalidi for that matter. I also laid out that the most disturbing association is the one Obama had with Alinsky. They never met, but it's clear Obama is well versed in the book "Rules For Radicals". Until recently, I heard Alinsky's name just a handful of times. Conservative pundits would have done a better service in talking about Obama's love for Alinsky and his book than talking about Wright over and over again. It wasn't working. Move on. To this day if one was to take a poll amongst everyday Americans, I'd guesstimate 85% of them have never heard of Saul Alinsky or know about his book. Americans should have been informed of this man and his book. They should have been informed that Obama said that his book was better than any class he took at prestigious Harvard and taught it in his classes. Would they have voted different? Boy, that's asking America a lot to put one and one together, but right now they'd be at least more uneasy about what's going on with this government pow .... I mean Obama powergrab. Now I'm going to say to those who read this that aren't up to date on the information the mainstream media has swept under the rug to put on the effin' glasses. Here are the glasses, now read on. This is Obama's outline for his plan for dictatorship, both past and future.
 
Nationalizing banks. This is a very scary thing to those that don't want socialism, but that's not even how Obama sees it. That's even scarier. He doesn't see it as socializing banks. He sees it as accumulating power. He is allowing smaller banks to fail while forcing bigger banks who took TARP money to keep it, even though they want to give it back. The phrase he uses is those bigger banks are "too big to fail", but his Alinsky translation glasses actually translates it to "the smaller banks are too many to control". The conglomeration of the bigger banks with all of those mergers laid the red carpet out for Obama. Now there is only a handful of major banks in this country, and most of them took TARP money. They want to give it back, but Obama won't take it back because he would lose power over them. He said in that "press conference" that he wants to have a smaller government, but no one asked him why he wouldn't allow the banks to give the money back.
 
Buying out car companies. I was for the auto companies getting bailouts because bankruptcy would lose too many jobs. I was blinded at the time to the other problem bankruptcy would offer. Obama is now in full control of two of the automakers. He forced investors in Chrysler to take 29 cents on the dollar. To those who resisted at first, Obama threatened to unleash the power of the White House press corps. This was challenged by Obama's auto Czar by saying "there is no evidence that happened". That's a guilty plea if I ever heard of one. Obama knows who his friends are, but I'll get to that later. GM executives last week decided to start panic selling their shares. They knew their company was going down, all the while saying everything was A-okay. I would say that is about as disgusting as one can get, but they saw what Obama did to Chrysler. They don't want 29 cents on the dollar for their shares. They knew he was going to replace the board like he did with Chrysler. They don't want Obama firing all of them like he already did with their CEO Wagoner and replacing them with Obama croneys until they have taken out all they could get. They wanted every nickel to be drained, but so did Obama, right? Even though Ford is fine for now, they share auto parts manufacturing. Obama is forcing the companies to conform to CAFE standards which would raise the prices of automobiles. Before the auto companies would have told him to stick it up his you know what. Now they have to conform. He owns them.
 
The steel industry is next. The steel industry has been the backbone in the American economy for decades. Our manufacturing of steel is a big component in how well our economy is doing. If steel production is doing well, most likely so is our economy. The steel industry is heavily dependent on the auto industry. It will be the next to go down. Obama will want to sink his teeth into the steel factories as well. The shipping industry will follow the steel industry. The lifeline of these industries will not slip through the grip of Obama. Obama will have to be in the bloodstream of the American economy.
 
According to Alinsky, friends and allies are only good to have if they can prop you up. If they are willing, then use them. If they aren't, then make them willing or throw them under the bus and dismantle them. Let the other friends and allies take them down. Rise above it all and put forth a friendly face to the masses. Be the Manchurian Candidate. Say things people will like, no matter if it's true. Put forth ideas people will like even if you have no intention of acting upon them. Let the allies blind the masses to the truth. It's working. A good majority of people do not like Obama's proposals. A good majority of people approve of Obama. Many people are greatly concerned with the government power grab, but with Obama putting his smiling face out there time and time again he looks to be someone they can find security in. That's why he says things you know he doesn't believe in. It's to appeal to the masses. That's why he said he wishes he could have a lean government even though you know he doesn't. That's why he says that the spending that's going on is unsustainable. People know that to be a fact, so the lazyminded will say "he's right about that", and that's the end of their thoughts. They won't take their thinking to the next step which is the question of why is he spending so much then? He can say anything because the American people are too lazy to think on their own. He knows they are more fixated with American Idol than what he's doing.
 
Scandals do not bother him. He makes sure in any scandal that he is above the fray. When opposition builds, he allows his minions to do his dirty work while following the makeup of the Manchurian Candidate. Occasionally he does fall short of the advice Alinsky gave, but he's human. According to Alinsky, Obama wasn't supposed to speak ill of people like Joe "the plumber" or the tea party people at all. He was supposed to stay above that, but he is very thin skinned. That's his weakness. In my next blog I will write how to beat Obama using that as his weakness.
 
When Obama told the investors of Chrysler that he would send the power of the press corps after them, it showed Obama knows the media works for him. They are seemingly willing to go along with Obama because of their ideology. Obama I have learned has no ideology. What look to be two peas in a pod really is the President using the media that has become blinded to their plans for a Eurotopia. Obama could care less, according to Alinsky's book. Government grabbing power isn't what we have come to know from European history. This is about Obama grabbing power, not socialism. Socialism is more the unintended consequence of the power grab. Obama is less about being Karl Marx and more about being Hugo Chavez. I have labeled him as a marxist myself, but I have opened my eyes because I've been reading Alinsky's book. I have to say I am more scared of Obama than I ever have before reading this book because in order for the book to work, the conditions must be just so for the American people to buy it. These conditions are here, my friends.
 
This blog and the next one are the two most important blogs I have ever written on here. I write many other blogs for fun. I write many other for political reasons while painting a different picture than most have. If you want a glimpse into Obama's agenda, here it is. Pass on this blog and the next one. The next one I will put forth how Obama can be beat. It won't be pretty. There will be lots of sacrificing for the greater good. I'm not trying to have a big head here, but any candidate that wishes to run against Obama should read this as well. This is the last shot at taking Obama down before he becomes our unwitting dictator. Hugo Chavez got his power somehow. The people gave it to him. Are the people of American that much more informed than the people of Venezuela, or is the American people ripe for the picking? The latter is true, and you know it. If something doesn't happen fast, our people will give our country a dictator as well. Then it will be too late. To Obama: I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick as$, and I'm all out of bubble gum.
 
                                              "TAKING DOWN THE GREAT ALINSKYITE"
 
 
In my last blog I laid out the case that Obama isn't really an ideological politician. He is about an all-consuming power grab. Alinsky's book "Rules For Radicals" isn't only a step by step rulebook to accumulate power in order to bring about social change, but it is also really about accumulating power to the point it will not be lost. While Alinsky's intentions were for marxism to bring about "social justice", it can be used to do with whatever the person who accumulates that power feels like doing with it. This is all about power. Ideology restricts too much of the audience. Ideology can come later. Ideology has to be put aside until that power is accumulated. With our Consititution, the people have to give that power away willfully. That is happening right now. Obama is out to break people into blocks of voters. That is why he is still campaigning. He's turning people into blocks of voters and then conquering enough of them to keep him in power. That's why he's empowering his allies such as unions, media, other minions like ACORN. He also is gathering power unto himself in an eerie game of Monopoly. The banks, auto companies, again the media, and even friendly states are powers he will bring under his umbrella. That is what Alinsky learned in Chicago, but then mastered it beyond any philosophy any Chicagoan had. Accumulate blocks of voters. Accumulate people willing to do the dirty work while you stand back and put forth a positive message for the masses. Intimidate through the minions. Blind the masses to opposing messages. For this to work nationally however, conditions must be just perfect and it would take a transformational figure to pull it off. Economic hardships. Confusion. Conglomeration of important financial institutions. America having not the brain capacity to see through anything because they do not pay attention. No matter how bad things are and no matter how much America dislikes the policies, Obama must and will continue to put his smiling face out there because that will make enough Americans secure in him. "I can't stand what he's doing with this country. Look at what this moron is doing. He's taking down what this country stands for, but I like this guy. He's such a great guy. He's like me. Look at his smile." A majority hate his policies, but yet still approve of his job. Totally incongruent. That is the mindless state of America that he is able to make them hate his policies but adore him. The nonmixture of oil and water can only be seen by the unblinded. That's where the Obama acolytes come in. Blind the masses. It worked and unless something extraordinary is done, it will continue to work. In this blog, I will lay out how to beat Obama before it's too late. I have no doubts Obama will win in 2012. I have very little doubt to the abolishment of the 22nd amendment. Too much power already and too many allies. Within four months, President Obama has already become the most powerful president in US history. Once that amendment is abolished, we will have our first dictator since the British monarchy with King George III. If a candidate and people follow by these rules, we can divert off from this trajectory. I think this is what it will take. Do not think this is impossible. Dictatorships started somehow. Follow what Hugo Chavez has done and is continuing to do, then you will see the parallels to this President is undeniable.
 
Facts have to be amassed as allies: One must have a good grasp of facts to counter the lies which the American people have become blinded to thinking that are real facts. They have bought into the mindset that if you tell a lie long enough, it becomes fact. Be relentless with your stating of facts. You cannot overstate facts. You MUST not understate them. McCain understated every fact he brought up. The lies are too broad and spoken of from a point of view of fact upon the blindful masses. Use facts and use them until either the people give in or look into them. Footnote your facts. Always use footnotes when presenting facts. The best footnotes to use are the ones you will find occasionally slipping through the cracks of the mainstream media or liberal outlets. Enough people know of the liberal bias and what the biggest source for bias is, so if you use facts that favor your position from them it will go a long way. Use eloquence and strength when presenting facts. Put them in a way so there is no parcing of the word. Make sure the facts are presented in a way to remove any possible question to its authenticity. The biggest enemy to a liberal happens to be the biggest enemy to Alinsky's strategy that Obama is employing. Those are facts. Bring up that the most progressive states are the states that are the most in trouble. Bring up that no experiment into socialism works. One must be relentless about stating facts, and that I cannot overstate. Pound the drum until their ears bleed. Realize what you're up against.
 
 
Confrontation is your friend: I don't mean confrontation while pulling punches. I mean let go of the restrictions of that little box you're in. Throw out in a fury as if you were Floyd Mayweather. Civility is your enemy right now. I don't mean being violent. I mean say things the way they really are. Say them with conviction. Call Obama out. To beat Obama, a person MUST call him out. Don't be afraid of the media. They'll attack you anyway. You want them to attack you, but take the battle to Obama. Call him out. Get personal. Get very personal. Don't be above the fray as Obama appears to be. He can be. You can't. Do you have minions to work your will? He does. If you call him out, he will show more of his true colors. Get under his skin. Get into his melon. Make him respond to you personally. Because of his thin skin, it won't take much. Make the people aware of Saul Alinsky and how Obama said his book was better than any class he took in Harvard. As is the case in using facts, use this relentlessly until America looks into Alinsky. This will bypass the mainstream media. Their response will be to try to paint Alinsky as a humble community organizer. Enough of the people that look into him will see him differently. If you can do this, you can render Obama's minions impotent. Enough people can then awaken to the Alinsky strategy and how Obama is using it. Speak with the anger that the people of America who are aware of what's going on has. Do not plead with tone or words like McCain did when he used his "nice guy" voice time and time again during the campaign. You cannot do that and beat this man. Be as mad as Bob Dole, but be as eloquent as Obama. That takes a special person. So far, I haven't seen anyone that fits that bill.
 
Attack him personally only on issues: Nothing else. The other things may be sexy to bring up, but the mainstream media will only show those attacks while ignoring the others that actually carry weight to most Americans. People should have learned during the Clinton years that no matter how bad a personal scandal may be, it has nothing to do with what is really going on. The populace gets turned off by such things, unless it happens to conservatives. That is the ugly truth, so accept it. You cannot use the same strategy and expect it to work. There are enough issues to attack this President on, and if the American people knew what the facts were they would be more apt to listen to you. Again, put them in a direct, unquestionable way. Do exactly what Dick Cheney did. Speak firmly, eloquently, and call this Alinskyite out personally. He has very thin skin. That's Obama's biggest weakness. The more anyone dares to stand up to him, the more his true self he reveals. Joe "The Plumber" asked him a simple question and Obama let it slip that he wanted to spread the wealth. All he did to make Obama mess up was ask him a direct question. Obama attacked Joe which showed an ugly side. He was supposed to let his minions do his dirty work, but his thin skin caused him to go away from his positive, Manchurian Candidate message. It's very possible and even easy to take Obama off of his game and cause him to make mistakes. Palin was able to get into Obama's head so much he flubbed up when he made that lipstick on a pig comment. You could see on his face that he was trying not to say it, but he couldn't stop himself. She didn't do much to get under the skin except she had energy and charisma. She stole a bit of his thunder. Obama was intimidated by that because he thought he was the only one that had those two things, until McCain named her his VP candidate.
 
Fight back at the mainstream media: I've heard people say only go on friendly media networks and outlets. I couldn't disagree with that more. Go on those minion networks, even MSNBC. But instead of being a punching bag, attack them. Attack them and call them out for their bias. Don't be afraid. Confrontation is your friend, remember. Just as you do this to the mainstream media, do the same to Obama. Go after him as if you have nothing to lose. If you want to beat him, then don't worry about possibly turning some people off. As long as you do it on issues and use facts, they will not be turned off by you. The ones that will be turned off by that are the ones that have already pledged their allegiance so there's no chance of swaying them anyway. Fight back at the moment. Don't wait until you gather a press release. Fight back right there and use examples of their bias. Put them back on their heals. Show you are not afraid to fight anyone. This will also intimidate Obama. The American populace just might see it that you are fighting for them, not yourself. Either way, they will find respect for you for standing up for yourself and the issues you are passionate about. The American people are passionate and angry. Be their representative by matching their anger when you attack Obama and fight back against the mainstream media minions. Make them understand that you understand them. Make them feel like you are fighting with their voices.
 
These are the things I believe that will take down this President. Only after reading Alinsky's book and studying Obama personally am I able to suggest these things. He has glaring weaknesses. Expose them and be unrelenting at attacking them. Gather those who are equally willing to say things the way they really are. Gather the strong who will not be intimidated by the acolytes. That small coalition will be big enough to take the great Alinskyite down. Do not allow attacks upon you to go unanswered. Do not try to correct misperceptions or false attacks. Let your allies do that. You answer the attack instead by going after the source of the attack personally. Expose their bias, not their lies. Let your allies expose their lies. In short, go everywhere. Make people hear you and your anger. Fight with every ounce of your strength for them. Fight with nothing to lose. Don't worry about the future. All that matters is now. For the people at Townhall, be even more vocal. Keep gathering. Don't attack personally on anything outside of an issue. Once we do that, we lose. Don't be afraid to confront anyone, but do it by using footnoted facts on issues. That's all. Their side is allowed to get away with personal attacks on nonissues. We can't. If we stick to this and realize what we're up against, we can take down the great Alinskyite. If not, then our future is very much in doubt. Power is a snowball rolling down a hill. It will only get bigger over time.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TAKING DOWN THE GREAT ALINSKYITE

In my last blog I laid out the case that Obama isn't really an ideological politician. He is about an all-consuming power grab. Alinsky's book "Rules For Radicals" isn't only a step by step rulebook to accumulate power in order to bring about social change, but it is also really about accumulating power to the point it will not be lost. While Alinsky's intentions were for marxism to bring about "social justice", it can be used to do with whatever the person who accumulates that power feels like doing with it. This is all about power. Ideology restricts too much of the audience. Ideology can come later. Ideology has to be put aside until that power is accumulated. With our Consititution, the people have to give that power away willfully. That is happening right now. Obama is out to break people into blocks of voters. That is why he is still campaigning. He's turning people into blocks of voters and then conquering enough of them to keep him in power. That's why he's empowering his allies such as unions, media, other minions like ACORN. He also is gathering power unto himself in an eerie game of Monopoly. The banks, auto companies, again the media, and even friendly states are powers he will bring under his umbrella. That is what Alinsky learned in Chicago, but then mastered it beyond any philosophy any Chicagoan had. Accumulate blocks of voters. Accumulate people willing to do the dirty work while you stand back and put forth a positive message for the masses. Intimidate through the minions. Blind the masses to opposing messages. For this to work nationally however, conditions must be just perfect and it would take a transformational figure to pull it off. Economic hardships. Confusion. Conglomeration of important financial institutions. America having not the brain capacity to see through anything because they do not pay attention. No matter how bad things are and no matter how much America dislikes the policies, Obama must and will continue to put his smiling face out there because that will make enough Americans secure in him. "I can't stand what he's doing with this country. Look at what this moron is doing. He's taking down what this country stands for, but I like this guy. He's such a great guy. He's like me. Look at his smile." A majority hate his policies, but yet still approve of his job. Totally incongruent. That is the mindless state of America that he is able to make them hate his policies but adore him. The nonmixture of oil and water can only be seen by the unblinded. That's where the Obama acolytes come in. Blind the masses. It worked and unless something extraordinary is done, it will continue to work. In this blog, I will lay out how to beat Obama before it's too late. I have no doubts Obama will win in 2012. I have very little doubt to the abolishment of the 22nd amendment. Too much power already and too many allies. Within four months, President Obama has already become the most powerful president in US history. Once that amendment is abolished, we will have our first dictator since the British monarchy with King George III. If a candidate and people follow by these rules, we can divert off from this trajectory. I think this is what it will take. Do not think this is impossible. Dictatorships started somehow. Follow what Hugo Chavez has done and is continuing to do, then you will see the parallels to this President is undeniable.
 
Facts have to be amassed as allies: One must have a good grasp of facts to counter the lies which the American people have become blinded to thinking that are real facts. They have bought into the mindset that if you tell a lie long enough, it becomes fact. Be relentless with your stating of facts. You cannot overstate facts. You MUST not understate them. McCain understated every fact he brought up. The lies are too broad and spoken of from a point of view of fact upon the blindful masses. Use facts and use them until either the people give in or look into them. Footnote your facts. Always use footnotes when presenting facts. The best footnotes to use are the ones you will find occasionally slipping through the cracks of the mainstream media or liberal outlets. Enough people know of the liberal bias and what the biggest source for bias is, so if you use facts that favor your position from them it will go a long way. Use eloquence and strength when presenting facts. Put them in a way so there is no parcing of the word. Make sure the facts are presented in a way to remove any possible question to its authenticity. The biggest enemy to a liberal happens to be the biggest enemy to Alinsky's strategy that Obama is employing. Those are facts. Bring up that the most progressive states are the states that are the most in trouble. Bring up that no experiment into socialism works. One must be relentless about stating facts, and that I cannot overstate. Pound the drum until their ears bleed. Realize what you're up against.
 
 
Confrontation is your friend: I don't mean confrontation while pulling punches. I mean let go of the restrictions of that little box you're in. Throw out in a fury as if you were Floyd Mayweather. Civility is your enemy right now. I don't mean being violent. I mean say things the way they really are. Say them with conviction. Call Obama out. To beat Obama, a person MUST call him out. Don't be afraid of the media. They'll attack you anyway. You want them to attack you, but take the battle to Obama. Call him out. Get personal. Get very personal. Don't be above the fray as Obama appears to be. He can be. You can't. Do you have minions to work your will? He does. If you call him out, he will show more of his true colors. Get under his skin. Get into his melon. Make him respond to you personally. Because of his thin skin, it won't take much. Make the people aware of Saul Alinsky and how Obama said his book was better than any class he took in Harvard. As is the case in using facts, use this relentlessly until America looks into Alinsky. This will bypass the mainstream media. Their response will be to try to paint Alinsky as a humble community organizer. Enough of the people that look into him will see him differently. If you can do this, you can render Obama's minions impotent. Enough people can then awaken to the Alinsky strategy and how Obama is using it. Speak with the anger that the people of America who are aware of what's going on has. Do not plead with tone or words like McCain did when he used his "nice guy" voice time and time again during the campaign. You cannot do that and beat this man. Be as mad as Bob Dole, but be as eloquent as Obama. That takes a special person. So far, I haven't seen anyone that fits that bill.
 
Attack him personally only on issues: Nothing else. The other things may be sexy to bring up, but the mainstream media will only show those attacks while ignoring the others that actually carry weight to most Americans. People should have learned during the Clinton years that no matter how bad a personal scandal may be, it has nothing to do with what is really going on. The populace gets turned off by such things, unless it happens to conservatives. That is the ugly truth, so accept it. You cannot use the same strategy and expect it to work. There are enough issues to attack this President on, and if the American people knew what the facts were they would be more apt to listen to you. Again, put them in a direct, unquestionable way. Do exactly what Dick Cheney did. Speak firmly, eloquently, and call this Alinskyite out personally. He has very thin skin. That's Obama's biggest weakness. The more anyone dares to stand up to him, the more his true self he reveals. Joe "The Plumber" asked him a simple question and Obama let it slip that he wanted to spread the wealth. All he did to make Obama mess up was ask him a direct question. Obama attacked Joe which showed an ugly side. He was supposed to let his minions do his dirty work, but his thin skin caused him to go away from his positive, Manchurian Candidate message. It's very possible and even easy to take Obama off of his game and cause him to make mistakes. Palin was able to get into Obama's head so much he flubbed up when he made that lipstick on a pig comment. You could see on his face that he was trying not to say it, but he couldn't stop himself. She didn't do much to get under the skin except she had energy and charisma. She stole a bit of his thunder. Obama was intimidated by that because he thought he was the only one that had those two things, until McCain named her his VP candidate.
 
Fight back at the mainstream media: I've heard people say only go on friendly media networks and outlets. I couldn't disagree with that more. Go on those minion networks, even MSNBC. But instead of being a punching bag, attack them. Attack them and call them out for their bias. Don't be afraid. Confrontation is your friend, remember. Just as you do this to the mainstream media, do the same to Obama. Go after him as if you have nothing to lose. If you want to beat him, then don't worry about possibly turning some people off. As long as you do it on issues and use facts, they will not be turned off by you. The ones that will be turned off by that are the ones that have already pledged their allegiance so there's no chance of swaying them anyway. Fight back at the moment. Don't wait until you gather a press release. Fight back right there and use examples of their bias. Put them back on their heals. Show you are not afraid to fight anyone. This will also intimidate Obama. The American populace just might see it that you are fighting for them, not yourself. Either way, they will find respect for you for standing up for yourself and the issues you are passionate about. The American people are passionate and angry. Be their representative by matching their anger when you attack Obama and fight back against the mainstream media minions. Make them understand that you understand them. Make them feel like you are fighting with their voices.
 
These are the things I believe that will take down this President. Only after reading Alinsky's book and studying Obama personally am I able to suggest these things. He has glaring weaknesses. Expose them and be unrelenting at attacking them. Gather those who are equally willing to say things the way they really are. Gather the strong who will not be intimidated by the acolytes. That small coalition will be big enough to take the great Alinskyite down. Do not allow attacks upon you to go unanswered. Do not try to correct misperceptions or false attacks. Let your allies do that. You answer the attack instead by going after the source of the attack personally. Expose their bias, not their lies. Let your allies expose their lies. In short, go everywhere. Make people hear you and your anger. Fight with every ounce of your strength for them. Fight with nothing to lose. Don't worry about the future. All that matters is now. For the people at Townhall, be even more vocal. Keep gathering. Don't attack personally on anything outside of an issue. Once we do that, we lose. Don't be afraid to confront anyone, but do it by using footnoted facts on issues. That's all. Their side is allowed to get away with personal attacks on nonissues. We can't. If we stick to this and realize what we're up against, we can take down the great Alinskyite. If not, then our future is very much in doubt. Power is a snowball rolling down a hill. It will only get bigger over time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (23) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TAKING DOWN THE GREAT ALINSKYITE

In my last blog I laid out the case that Obama isn't really an ideological politician. He is about an all-consuming power grab. Alinsky's book "Rules For Radicals" isn't only a step by step rulebook to accumulate power in order to bring about social change, but it is also really about accumulating power to the point it will not be lost. While Alinsky's intentions were for marxism to bring about "social justice", it can be used to do with whatever the person who accumulates that power feels like doing with it. This is all about power. Ideology restricts too much of the audience. Ideology can come later. Ideology has to be put aside until that power is accumulated. With our Consititution, the people have to give that power away willfully. That is happening right now. Obama is out to break people into blocks of voters. That is why he is still campaigning. He's turning people into blocks of voters and then conquering enough of them to keep him in power. That's why he's empowering his allies such as unions, media, other minions like ACORN. He also is gathering power unto himself in an eerie game of Monopoly. The banks, auto companies, again the media, and even friendly states are powers he will bring under his umbrella. That is what Alinsky learned in Chicago, but then mastered it beyond any philosophy any Chicagoan had. Accumulate blocks of voters. Accumulate people willing to do the dirty work while you stand back and put forth a positive message for the masses. Intimidate through the minions. Blind the masses to opposing messages. For this to work nationally however, conditions must be just perfect and it would take a transformational figure to pull it off. Economic hardships. Confusion. Conglomeration of important financial institutions. America having not the brain capacity to see through anything because they do not pay attention. No matter how bad things are and no matter how much America dislikes the policies, Obama must and will continue to put his smiling face out there because that will make enough Americans secure in him. "I can't stand what he's doing with this country. Look at what this moron is doing. He's taking down what this country stands for, but I like this guy. He's such a great guy. He's like me. Look at his smile." A majority hate his policies, but yet still approve of his job. Totally incongruent. That is the mindless state of America that he is able to make them hate his policies but adore him. The nonmixture of oil and water can only be seen by the unblinded. That's where the Obama acolytes come in. Blind the masses. It worked and unless something extraordinary is done, it will continue to work. In this blog, I will lay out how to beat Obama before it's too late. I have no doubts Obama will win in 2012. I have very little doubt to the abolishment of the 22nd amendment. Too much power already and too many allies. Within four months, President Obama has already become the most powerful president in US history. Once that amendment is abolished, we will have our first dictator since the British monarchy with King George III. If a candidate and people follow by these rules, we can divert off from this trajectory. I think this is what it will take. Do not think this is impossible. Dictatorships started somehow. Follow what Hugo Chavez has done and is continuing to do, then you will see the parallels to this President is undeniable.
 
Facts have to be amassed as allies: One must have a good grasp of facts to counter the lies which the American people have become blinded to thinking that are real facts. They have bought into the mindset that if you tell a lie long enough, it becomes fact. Be relentless with your stating of facts. You cannot overstate facts. You MUST not understate them. McCain understated every fact he brought up. The lies are too broad and spoken of from a point of view of fact upon the blindful masses. Use facts and use them until either the people give in or look into them. Footnote your facts. Always use footnotes when presenting facts. The best footnotes to use are the ones you will find occasionally slipping through the cracks of the mainstream media or liberal outlets. Enough people know of the liberal bias and what the biggest source for bias is, so if you use facts that favor your position from them it will go a long way. Use eloquence and strength when presenting facts. Put them in a way so there is no parcing of the word. Make sure the facts are presented in a way to remove any possible question to its authenticity. The biggest enemy to a liberal happens to be the biggest enemy to Alinsky's strategy that Obama is employing. Those are facts. Bring up that the most progressive states are the states that are the most in trouble. Bring up that no experiment into socialism works. One must be relentless about stating facts, and that I cannot overstate. Pound the drum until their ears bleed. Realize what you're up against.
 
 
Confrontation is your friend: I don't mean confrontation while pulling punches. I mean let go of the restrictions of that little box you're in. Throw out in a fury as if you were Floyd Mayweather. Civility is your enemy right now. I don't mean being violent. I mean say things the way they really are. Say them with conviction. Call Obama out. To beat Obama, a person MUST call him out. Don't be afraid of the media. They'll attack you anyway. You want them to attack you, but take the battle to Obama. Call him out. Get personal. Get very personal. Don't be above the fray as Obama appears to be. He can be. You can't. Do you have minions to work your will? He does. If you call him out, he will show more of his true colors. Get under his skin. Get into his melon. Make him respond to you personally. Because of his thin skin, it won't take much. Make the people aware of Saul Alinsky and how Obama said his book was better than any class he took in Harvard. As is the case in using facts, use this relentlessly until America looks into Alinsky. This will bypass the mainstream media. Their response will be to try to paint Alinsky as a humble community organizer. Enough of the people that look into him will see him differently. If you can do this, you can render Obama's minions impotent. Enough people can then awaken to the Alinsky strategy and how Obama is using it. Speak with the anger that the people of America who are aware of what's going on has. Do not plead with tone or words like McCain did when he used his "nice guy" voice time and time again during the campaign. You cannot do that and beat this man. Be as mad as Bob Dole, but be as eloquent as Obama. That takes a special person. So far, I haven't seen anyone that fits that bill.
 
Attack him personally only on issues: Nothing else. The other things may be sexy to bring up, but the mainstream media will only show those attacks while ignoring the others that actually carry weight to most Americans. People should have learned during the Clinton years that no matter how bad a personal scandal may be, it has nothing to do with what is really going on. The populace gets turned off by such things, unless it happens to conservatives. That is the ugly truth, so accept it. You cannot use the same strategy and expect it to work. There are enough issues to attack this President on, and if the American people knew what the facts were they would be more apt to listen to you. Again, put them in a direct, unquestionable way. Do exactly what Dick Cheney did. Speak firmly, eloquently, and call this Alinskyite out personally. He has very thin skin. That's Obama's biggest weakness. The more anyone dares to stand up to him, the more his true self he reveals. Joe "The Plumber" asked him a simple question and Obama let it slip that he wanted to spread the wealth. All he did to make Obama mess up was ask him a direct question. Obama attacked Joe which showed an ugly side. He was supposed to let his minions do his dirty work, but his thin skin caused him to go away from his positive, Manchurian Candidate message. It's very possible and even easy to take Obama off of his game and cause him to make mistakes. Palin was able to get into Obama's head so much he flubbed up when he made that lipstick on a pig comment. You could see on his face that he was trying not to say it, but he couldn't stop himself. She didn't do much to get under the skin except she had energy and charisma. She stole a bit of his thunder. Obama was intimidated by that because he thought he was the only one that had those two things, until McCain named her his VP candidate.
 
Fight back at the mainstream media: I've heard people say only go on friendly media networks and outlets. I couldn't disagree with that more. Go on those minion networks, even MSNBC. But instead of being a punching bag, attack them. Attack them and call them out for their bias. Don't be afraid. Confrontation is your friend, remember. Just as you do this to the mainstream media, do the same to Obama. Go after him as if you have nothing to lose. If you want to beat him, then don't worry about possibly turning some people off. As long as you do it on issues and use facts, they will not be turned off by you. The ones that will be turned off by that are the ones that have already pledged their allegiance so there's no chance of swaying them anyway. Fight back at the moment. Don't wait until you gather a press release. Fight back right there and use examples of their bias. Put them back on their heals. Show you are not afraid to fight anyone. This will also intimidate Obama. The American populace just might see it that you are fighting for them, not yourself. Either way, they will find respect for you for standing up for yourself and the issues you are passionate about. The American people are passionate and angry. Be their representative by matching their anger when you attack Obama and fight back against the mainstream media minions. Make them understand that you understand them. Make them feel like you are fighting with their voices.
 
These are the things I believe that will take down this President. Only after reading Alinsky's book and studying Obama personally am I able to suggest these things. He has glaring weaknesses. Expose them and be unrelenting at attacking them. Gather those who are equally willing to say things the way they really are. Gather the strong who will not be intimidated by the acolytes. That small coalition will be big enough to take the great Alinskyite down. Do not allow attacks upon you to go unanswered. Do not try to correct misperceptions or false attacks. Let your allies do that. You answer the attack instead by going after the source of the attack personally. Expose their bias, not their lies. Let your allies expose their lies. In short, go everywhere. Make people hear you and your anger. Fight with every ounce of your strength for them. Fight with nothing to lose. Don't worry about the future. All that matters is now. For the people at Townhall, be even more vocal. Keep gathering. Don't attack personally on anything outside of an issue. Once we do that, we lose. Don't be afraid to confront anyone, but do it by using footnoted facts on issues. That's all. Their side is allowed to get away with personal attacks on nonissues. We can't. If we stick to this and realize what we're up against, we can take down the great Alinskyite. If not, then our future is very much in doubt. Power is a snowball rolling down a hill. It will only get bigger over time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PUT ON THE EFFIN' GLASSES!

Sorry for such a long period of time between posts and lack of comments on your posts recently, but haven't been on the puter for a LONG time. Don't worry though. The "Mind" is back in full effect. I was watching one of my favorite movies here recently, and it so reminded me of what is going on right now. The movie was "They Live" which starred Rowdy Roddy Piper and Keith David. It was about a secret alien invasion which went under the noses of unsuspecting Americans. The aliens were camoflauged by a signal beaming down from a satellite dish atop of a media building (perhaps just a coincidence). The only way to see the aliens for who they were was to put on some special shades which showed the aliens for who they really were. Ugly invaders of America. Piper's character tried to convince David's character to put on the glasses to see what he had been blinded to. What ensued was the best fighting scene in movie history, but eventually Keith David put on the glasses. On a side note, Keith David is one of my favorite actors. Very underrated. The mind boggling part of the movie was that it was actually written to talk about conservatives and how their way is invading the conscience of America without America knowing. I know. That is one for the Bizarro World.

 
I've been doing some reading lately. Yes, I can read. You didn't know that? Well barely. I've been reading an important book according to Obama. Saul Alinsky's now infamous book "Rules For Radicals" is a model on how to be a dictator. It's not about left-wing radical ideas. It's simply about pushing forth an agenda to accumulate power. Anything goes in this quest for power, especially throwing allies under the bus. Even their positions under the bus. It's all about obtaining power to the point it will not be lost. I knew Obama's affinity for Alinksy's book, but until I started reading it I didn't fully understand Obama's end game. Obama taught Alinsky's book in his class. Obama said of this book that it was better than any class he ever took at Harvard. Recent discussions on conservative-friendly outlets are looking more in Obama's actions and how they form fit to Alinsky's suggestions in his book. While they were talking about Reverend Wright and William Ayers to no end during the long, long campaign, these pundits all but ignored Alinsky. I railed on about Obama's associations as well, but I never left out Alinsky or Rashid Khalidi for that matter. I also laid out that the most disturbing association is the one Obama had with Alinsky. They never met, but it's clear Obama is well versed in the book "Rules For Radicals". Until recently, I heard Alinsky's name just a handful of times. Conservative pundits would have done a better service in talking about Obama's love for Alinsky and his book than talking about Wright over and over again. It wasn't working. Move on. To this day if one was to take a poll amongst everyday Americans, I'd guesstimate 85% of them have never heard of Saul Alinsky or know about his book. Americans should have been informed of this man and his book. They should have been informed that Obama said that his book was better than any class he took at prestigious Harvard and taught it in his classes. Would they have voted different? Boy, that's asking America a lot to put one and one together, but right now they'd be at least more uneasy about what's going on with this government pow .... I mean Obama powergrab. Now I'm going to say to those who read this that aren't up to date on the information the mainstream media has swept under the rug to put on the effin' glasses. Here are the glasses, now read on. This is Obama's outline for his plan for dictatorship, both past and future.
 
Nationalizing banks. This is a very scary thing to those that don't want socialism, but that's not even how Obama sees it. That's even scarier. He doesn't see it as socializing banks. He sees it as accumulating power. He is allowing smaller banks to fail while forcing bigger banks who took TARP money to keep it, even though they want to give it back. The phrase he uses is those bigger banks are "too big to fail", but his Alinsky translation glasses actually translates it to "the smaller banks are too many to control". The conglomeration of the bigger banks with all of those mergers laid the red carpet out for Obama. Now there is only a handful of major banks in this country, and most of them took TARP money. They want to give it back, but Obama won't take it back because he would lose power over them. He said in that "press conference" that he wants to have a smaller government, but no one asked him why he wouldn't allow the banks to give the money back.
 
Buying out car companies. I was for the auto companies getting bailouts because bankruptcy would lose too many jobs. I was blinded at the time to the other problem bankruptcy would offer. Obama is now in full control of two of the automakers. He forced investors in Chrysler to take 29 cents on the dollar. To those who resisted at first, Obama threatened to unleash the power of the White House press corps. This was challenged by Obama's auto Czar by saying "there is no evidence that happened". That's a guilty plea if I ever heard of one. Obama knows who his friends are, but I'll get to that later. GM executives last week decided to start panic selling their shares. They knew their company was going down, all the while saying everything was A-okay. I would say that is about as disgusting as one can get, but they saw what Obama did to Chrysler. They don't want 29 cents on the dollar for their shares. They knew he was going to replace the board like he did with Chrysler. They don't want Obama firing all of them like he already did with their CEO Wagoner and replacing them with Obama croneys until they have taken out all they could get. They wanted every nickel to be drained, but so did Obama, right? Even though Ford is fine for now, they share auto parts manufacturing. Obama is forcing the companies to conform to CAFE standards which would raise the prices of automobiles. Before the auto companies would have told him to stick it up his you know what. Now they have to conform. He owns them.
 
The steel industry is next. The steel industry has been the backbone in the American economy for decades. Our manufacturing of steel is a big component in how well our economy is doing. If steel production is doing well, most likely so is our economy. The steel industry is heavily dependent on the auto industry. It will be the next to go down. Obama will want to sink his teeth into the steel factories as well. The shipping industry will follow the steel industry. The lifeline of these industries will not slip through the grip of Obama. Obama will have to be in the bloodstream of the American economy.
 
According to Alinsky, friends and allies are only good to have if they can prop you up. If they are willing, then use them. If they aren't, then make them willing or throw them under the bus and dismantle them. Let the other friends and allies take them down. Rise above it all and put forth a friendly face to the masses. Be the Manchurian Candidate. Say things people will like, no matter if it's true. Put forth ideas people will like even if you have no intention of acting upon them. Let the allies blind the masses to the truth. It's working. A good majority of people do not like Obama's proposals. A good majority of people approve of Obama. Many people are greatly concerned with the government power grab, but with Obama putting his smiling face out there time and time again he looks to be someone they can find security in. That's why he says things you know he doesn't believe in. It's to appeal to the masses. That's why he said he wishes he could have a lean government even though you know he doesn't. That's why he says that the spending that's going on is unsustainable. People know that to be a fact, so the lazyminded will say "he's right about that", and that's the end of their thoughts. They won't take their thinking to the next step which is the question of why is he spending so much then? He can say anything because the American people are too lazy to think on their own. He knows they are more fixated with American Idol than what he's doing.
 
Scandals do not bother him. He makes sure in any scandal that he is above the fray. When opposition builds, he allows his minions to do his dirty work while following the makeup of the Manchurian Candidate. Occasionally he does fall short of the advice Alinsky gave, but he's human. According to Alinsky, Obama wasn't supposed to speak ill of people like Joe "the plumber" or the tea party people at all. He was supposed to stay above that, but he is very thin skinned. That's his weakness. In my next blog I will write how to beat Obama using that as his weakness.
 
When Obama told the investors of Chrysler that he would send the power of the press corps after them, it showed Obama knows the media works for him. They are seemingly willing to go along with Obama because of their ideology. Obama I have learned has no ideology. What look to be two peas in a pod really is the President using the media that has become blinded to their plans for a Eurotopia. Obama could care less, according to Alinsky's book. Government grabbing power isn't what we have come to know from European history. This is about Obama grabbing power, not socialism. Socialism is more the unintended consequence of the power grab. Obama is less about being Karl Marx and more about being Hugo Chavez. I have labeled him as a marxist myself, but I have opened my eyes because I've been reading Alinsky's book. I have to say I am more scared of Obama than I ever have before reading this book because in order for the book to work, the conditions must be just so for the American people to buy it. These conditions are here, my friends.
 
This blog and the next one are the two most important blogs I have ever written on here. I write many other blogs for fun. I write many other for political reasons while painting a different picture than most have. If you want a glimpse into Obama's agenda, here it is. Pass on this blog and the next one. The next one I will put forth how Obama can be beat. It won't be pretty. There will be lots of sacrificing for the greater good. I'm not trying to have a big head here, but any candidate that wishes to run against Obama should read this as well. This is the last shot at taking Obama down before he becomes our unwitting dictator. Hugo Chavez got his power somehow. The people gave it to him. Are the people of American that much more informed than the people of Venezuela, or is the American people ripe for the picking? The latter is true, and you know it. If something doesn't happen fast, our people will give our country a dictator as well. Then it will be too late. To Obama: I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick as$, and I'm all out of bubble gum.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PUT ON THE EFFIN' GLASSES!

Sorry for such a long period of time between posts and lack of comments on your posts recently, but haven't been on the puter for a LONG time. Don't worry though. The "Mind" is back in full effect. I was watching one of my favorite movies here recently, and it so reminded me of what is going on right now. The movie was "They Live" which starred Rowdy Roddy Piper and Keith David. It was about a secret alien invasion which went under the noses of unsuspecting Americans. The aliens were camoflauged by a signal beaming down from a satellite dish atop of a media building (perhaps just a coincidence). The only way to see the aliens for who they were was to put on some special shades which showed the aliens for who they really were. Ugly invaders of America. Piper's character tried to convince David's character to put on the glasses to see what he had been blinded to. What ensued was the best fighting scene in movie history, but eventually Keith David put on the glasses. On a side note, Keith David is one of my favorite actors. Very underrated. The mind boggling part of the movie was that it was actually written to talk about conservatives and how their way is invading the conscience of America without America knowing. I know. That is one for the Bizarro World.

 
I've been doing some reading lately. Yes, I can read. You didn't know that? Well barely. I've been reading an important book according to Obama. Saul Alinsky's now infamous book "Rules For Radicals" is a model on how to be a dictator. It's not about left-wing radical ideas. It's simply about pushing forth an agenda to accumulate power. Anything goes in this quest for power, especially throwing allies under the bus. Even their positions under the bus. It's all about obtaining power to the point it will not be lost. I knew Obama's affinity for Alinksy's book, but until I started reading it I didn't fully understand Obama's end game. Obama taught Alinsky's book in his class. Obama said of this book that it was better than any class he ever took at Harvard. Recent discussions on conservative-friendly outlets are looking more in Obama's actions and how they form fit to Alinsky's suggestions in his book. While they were talking about Reverend Wright and William Ayers to no end during the long, long campaign, these pundits all but ignored Alinsky. I railed on about Obama's associations as well, but I never left out Alinsky or Rashid Khalidi for that matter. I also laid out that the most disturbing association is the one Obama had with Alinsky. They never met, but it's clear Obama is well versed in the book "Rules For Radicals". Until recently, I heard Alinsky's name just a handful of times. Conservative pundits would have done a better service in talking about Obama's love for Alinsky and his book than talking about Wright over and over again. It wasn't working. Move on. To this day if one was to take a poll amongst everyday Americans, I'd guesstimate 85% of them have never heard of Saul Alinsky or knew about his book. Americans should have been informed of this man and his book. They should have been informed that Obama said that his book was better than any class he took at prestigious Harvard and taught it in his classes. Would they have voted different? Boy, that's asking America a lot to put one and one together, but right now they'd be at least more uneasy about what's going on with this government pow .... I mean Obama powergrab. Now I'm going to say to those who read this that aren't up to date on the information the mainstream media has swept under the rug to put on the effin' glasses. Here are the glasses, now read on. This is Obama's outline for his plan for dictatorship, both past and future.
 
Nationalizing banks. This is a very scary thing to those that don't want socialism, but that's not even how Obama sees it. That's even scarier. He doesn't see it as socializing banks. He sees it as accumulating power. He is allowing smaller banks to fail while forcing bigger banks who took tarp money to keep it, even though they want to give it back. The phrase he uses is those bigger banks are "too big to fail", but his Alinsky translation glasses actually translates it to the smaller banks are too many to control. The conglomeration of the bigger banks with all of those mergers laid the red carpet out for Obama. Now there is only a handful of major banks in this country, and every one of them took tarp money. They want to give it back, but Obama won't take it back because he would lose power over them. He said in that "press conference" that he wants to have a smaller government, but no one asked him why he wouldn't allow the banks to give the money back.
 
Buying out car companies. I was for the auto companies getting bailouts because bankruptcy would lose too many jobs. I was blinded at the time to the other problem bankruptcy would offer. Obama is now in full control of two of the automakers. He forced investors in Chrysler to take 29 cents on the dollar. To those who resisted at first, Obama threatened to unleash the power of the White House press corps. This was challenged by Obama's auto Czar by saying "there is no evidence that happened". That's a guilty plea if I ever heard of one. Obama knows who his friends are, but I'll get to that later. GM executives last week decided to start panic selling their shares. They knew their company was going down, all the while saying everything was A-okay. I would say that is about as disgusting as one can get, but they saw what Obama did to Chrysler. They don't want 29 cents on the dollar for their shares. They knew he was going to replace the board like he did with Chrysler. They don't want Obama firing all of them like he already did with their CEO Wagoner and replacing them with Obama croneys until they have taken out all they could get. They wanted every nickel to be drained, but so did Obama, right? Even though Ford is fine for now, they share auto parts manufacturing. Obama is forcing the companies to conform to CAFE standards which would raise the prices of automobiles. Before the auto companies would have told him to stick it up his you know what. Now they have to conform. He owns them.
 
The steel industry is next. The steel industry has been the backbone in the American economy for decades. Our manufacturing of steel is a big component in how well our economy is doing. If steel production is doing well, most likely so is our economy. The steel industry is heavily dependent on the auto industry. It will be the next to go down. Obama will want to sink his teeth into the steel factories as well. The shipping industry will follow the steel industry. The lifeline of these industries will not slip through the grip of Obama. Obama will have to be in the bloodstream of the American economy.
 
According to Alinsky, friends and allies are only good to have if they can prop you up. If they are willing, then use them. If they aren't, then make them willing or throw them under the bus and dismantle them. Let the other friends and allies take them down. Rise above it all and put forth a friendly face to the masses. Be the Manchurian Candidate. Say things people will like, no matter if it's true. Put forth ideas people will like even if you have no intention of acting upon them. Let the allies blind the masses to the truth. It's working. A good majority of people do not like Obama's proposals. A good majority of people approve of Obama. Many people are greatly concerned with the government power grab, but with Obama putting his smiling face out there time and time again he looks to be someone they can find security in. That's why he says things you know he doesn't believe in. It's to appeal to the masses. That's why he said he wishes he could have a lean government even though you know he doesn't. That's why he says that the spending that's going on is unsustainable. People know that to be a fact, so the lazyminded will say "he's right about that", and that's the end of their thoughts. They won't take their thinking to the next step which is the question of why is he spending so much then? He can say anything because the American people are too lazy to think on their own. He knows they are more fixated with American Idol than what he's doing.
 
Scandals do not bother him. He makes sure in any scandal that he is above the fray. When opposition builds, he allows his minions to do his dirty work while following the makeup of the Manchurian Candidate. Occasionally he does fall short of the advice Alinsky gave, but he's human. According to Alinsky, Obama wasn't supposed to speak ill of people like Joe "the plumber" or the tea party people at all. He was supposed to stay above that, but he is very thin skinned. That's his weakness. In my next blog I will write how to beat Obama using that as his weakness.
 
When Obama told the investors of Chrysler that he would send the power of the press corps after them, it showed Obama knows the media works for him. They are seemingly willing to go along with Obama because of their ideology. Obama I have learned has no ideology. What look to be two peas in a pod really is the President using the media that has become blinded to their plans for a Eurotopia. Obama could care less, according to Alinsky's book. Government grabbing power isn't what we have come to know from European history. This is about Obama grabbing power, not socialism. Socialism is more the unintended consequence of the power grab. Obama is less about being Karl Marx and more about being Hugo Chavez. I have labeled him as a marxist myself, but I have opened my eyes because I've been reading Alinsky's book. I have to say I am more scared of Obama than I ever have before reading this book because in order for the book to work, the conditions must be just so for the American people to buy it. These conditions are here, my friends.
 
This blog and the next one are the two most important blogs I have ever written on here. I write many other blogs for fun. I write many other for political reasons while painting a different picture than most have. If you want a glimpse into Obama's agenda, here it is. Pass on this blog and the next one. The next one I will put forth how Obama can be beat. It won't be pretty. There will be lots of sacrificing for the greater good. I'm not trying to have a big head here, but any candidate that wishes to run against Obama should read this as well. This is the last shot at taking Obama down before he becomes our unwitting dictator. Hugo Chavez got his power somehow. The people gave it to him. Are the people of American that much more informed than the people of Venezuela, or is the American people ripe for the picking? The latter is true, and you know it. If something doesn't happen fast, our people will give our country a dictator as well. Then it will be too late. To Obama: I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick as$, and I'm all out of bubble gum.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PUT ON THE EFFIN' GLASSES!

Sorry for such a long period of time between posts and lack of comments on your posts recently, but haven't been on the puter for a LONG time. Don't worry though. The "Mind" is back in full effect. I was watching one of my favorite movies here recently, and it so reminded me of what is going on right now. The movie was "They Live" which starred Rowdy Roddy Piper and Keith David. It was about a secret alien invasion which went under the noses of unsuspecting Americans. The aliens were camoflauged by a signal beaming down from a satellite dish atop of a media building (perhaps just a coincidence). The only way to see the aliens for who they were was to put on some special shades which showed the aliens for who they really were. Ugly invaders of America. Piper's character tried to convince David's character to put on the glasses to see what he had been blinded to. What ensued was the best fighting scene in movie history, but eventually Keith David put on the glasses. On a side note, Keith David is one of my favorite actors. Very underrated. The mind boggling part of the movie was that it was actually written to talk about conservatives and how their way is invading the conscience of America without America knowing. I know. That is one for the Bizarro World.

 
I've been doing some reading lately. Yes, I can read. You didn't know that? Well barely. I've been reading an important book according to Obama. Saul Alinsky's now infamous book "Rules For Radicals" is a model on how to be a dictator. It's not about left-wing radical ideas. It's simply about pushing forth an agenda to accumulate power. Anything goes in this quest for power, especially throwing allies under the bus. Even their positions under the bus. It's all about obtaining power to the point it will not be lost. I knew Obama's affinity for Alinksy's book, but until I started reading it I didn't fully understand Obama's end game. Obama taught Alinsky's book in his class. Obama said of this book that it was better than any class he ever took at Harvard. Recent discussions on conservative-friendly outlets are looking more in Obama's actions and how they form fit to Alinsky's suggestions in his book. While they were talking about Reverend Wright and William Ayers to no end during the long, long campaign, these pundits all but ignored Alinsky. I railed on about Obama's associations as well, but I never left out Alinsky or Rashid Khalidi for that matter. I also laid out that the most disturbing association is the one Obama had with Alinsky. They never met, but it's clear Obama is well versed in the book "Rules For Radicals". Until recently, I heard Alinsky's name just a handful of times. Conservative pundits would have done a better service in talking about Obama's love for Alinsky and his book than talking about Wright over and over again. It wasn't working. Move on. To this day if one was to take a poll amongst everyday Americans, I'd guesstimate 85% of them have never heard of Saul Alinsky or knew about his book. Americans should have been informed of this man and his book. They should have been informed that Obama said that his book was better than any class he took at prestigious Harvard and taught it in his classes. Would they have voted different? Boy, that's asking America a lot to put one and one together, but right now they'd be at least more uneasy about what's going on with this government pow .... I mean Obama powergrab. Now I'm going to say to those who read this that aren't up to date on the information the mainstream media has swept under the rug to put on the effin' glasses. Here are the glasses, now read on. This is Obama's outline for his plan for dictatorship, both past and future.
 
Nationalizing banks. This is a very scary thing to those that don't want socialism, but that's not even how Obama sees it. That's even scarier. He doesn't see it as socializing banks. He sees it as accumulating power. He is allowing smaller banks to fail while forcing bigger banks who took tarp money to keep it, even though they want to give it back. The phrase he uses is those bigger banks are "too big to fail", but his Alinsky translation glasses actually translates it to the smaller banks are too many to control. The conglomeration of the bigger banks with all of those mergers laid the red carpet out for Obama. Now there is only a handful of major banks in this country, and every one of them took tarp money. They want to give it back, but Obama won't take it back because he would lose power over them. He said in that "press conference" that he wants to have a smaller government, but no one asked him why he wouldn't allow the banks to give the money back.
 
Buying out car companies. I was for the auto companies getting bailouts because bankruptcy would lose too many jobs. I was blinded at the time to the other problem bankruptcy would offer. Obama is now in full control of two of the automakers. He forced investors in Chrysler to take 29 cents on the dollar. To those who resisted at first, Obama threatened to unleash the power of the White House press corps. This was challenged by Obama's auto Czar by saying "there is no evidence that happened". That's a guilty plea if I ever heard of one. Obama knows who his friends are, but I'll get to that later. GM executives last week decided to start panic selling their shares. They knew their company was going down, all the while saying everything was A-okay. I would say that is about as disgusting as one can get, but they saw what Obama did to Chrysler. They don't want 29 cents on the dollar for their shares. They knew he was going to replace the board like he did with Chrysler. They don't want Obama firing all of them like he already did with their CEO Wagoner and replacing them with Obama croneys until they have taken out all they could get. They wanted every nickel to be drained, but so did Obama, right? Even though Ford is fine for now, they share auto parts manufacturing. Obama is forcing the companies to conform to CAFE standards which would raise the prices of automobiles. Before the auto companies would have told him to stick it up his you know what. Now they have to conform. He owns them.
 
The steel industry is next. The steel industry has been the backbone in the American economy for decades. Our manufacturing of steel is a big component in how well our economy is doing. If steel production is doing well, most likely so is our economy. The steel industry is heavily dependent on the auto industry. It will be the next to go down. Obama will want to sink his teeth into the steel factories as well. The shipping industry will follow the steel industry. The lifeline of these industries will not slip through the grip of Obama. Obama will have to be in the bloodstream of the American economy.
 
According to Alinsky, friends and allies are only good to have if they can prop you up. If they are willing, then use them. If they aren't, then make them willing or throw them under the bus and dismantle them. Let the other friends and allies take them down. Rise above it all and put forth a friendly face to the masses. Be the Manchurian Candidate. Say things people will like, no matter if it's true. Put forth ideas people will like even if you have no intention of acting upon them. Let the allies blind the masses to the truth. It's working. A good majority of people do not like Obama's proposals. A good majority of people approve of Obama. Many people are greatly concerned with the government power grab, but with Obama putting his smiling face out there time and time again he looks to be someone they can find security in. That's why he says things you know he doesn't believe in. It's to appeal to the masses. That's why he said he wishes he could have a lean government even though you know he doesn't. That's why he says that the spending that's going on is unsustainable. People know that to be a fact, so the lazyminded will say "he's right about that", and that's the end of their thoughts. They won't take their thinking to the next step which is the question of why is he spending so much then? He can say anything because the American people are too lazy to think on their own. He knows they are more fixated with American Idol than what he's doing.
 
Scandals do not bother him. He makes sure in any scandal that he is above the fray. When opposition builds, he allows his minions to do his dirty work while following the makeup of the Manchurian Candidate. Occasionally he does fall short of the advice Alinsky gave, but he's human. According to Alinsky, Obama wasn't supposed to speak ill of people like Joe "the plumber" or the tea party people at all. He was supposed to stay above that, but he is very thin skinned. That's his weakness. In my next blog I will write how to beat Obama using that as his weakness.
 
When Obama told the investors of Chrysler that he would send the power of the press corps after them, it showed Obama knows the media works for him. They are seemingly willing to go along with Obama because of their ideology. Obama I have learned has no ideology. What look to be two peas in a pod really is the President using the media that has become blinded to their plans for a Eurotopia. Obama could care less, according to Alinsky's book. Government grabbing power isn't what we have come to know from European history. This is about Obama grabbing power, not socialism. Socialism is more the unintended consequence of the power grab. Obama is less about being Karl Marx and more about being Hugo Chavez. I have labeled him as a marxist myself, but I have opened my eyes because I've been reading Alinsky's book. I have to say I am more scared of Obama than I ever have before reading this book because in order for the book to work, the conditions must be just so for the American people to buy it. These conditions are here, my friends.
 
This blog and the next one are the two most important blogs I have ever written on here. I write many other blogs for fun. I write many other for political reasons while painting a different picture than most have. If you want a glimpse into Obama's agenda, here it is. Pass on this blog and the next one. The next one I will put forth how Obama can be beat. It won't be pretty. There will be lots of sacrificing for the greater good. I'm not trying to have a big head here, but any candidate that wishes to run against Obama should read this as well. This is the last shot at taking Obama down before he becomes our unwitting dictator. Hugo Chavez got his power somehow. The people gave it to him. Are the people of American that much more informed than the people of Venezuela, or is the American people ripe for the picking? The latter is true, and you know it. If something doesn't happen fast, our people will give our country a dictator as well. Then it will be too late. To Obama: I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick as$, and I'm all out of bubble gum.
 
 
 
 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

HOW DO YOU SPELL "LIBERAL"? H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E

The left continues to be more and more hypocritical by the day. I don't know how they can do it. What's worse is how they get away with it. "Because no one holds them accountable!" Thanks, dude from the peanut gallery. You're right. No one holds them accountable except for the same three things each and everytime. Foxnews, talk radio, and the internet with sites such as Townhall.com. That's all. The mainstream media doesn't only not hold them accountable, but they are part of it themselves. They are the bread their messiah keeps dividing for the starving masses. No fish. Fish have feelings and can feel pain. There was the "press conference" today, if you could call it that. The reporter from the NY Times asked what Obama was "enchanted" by in his first one hundred days in office. "Oh how sweet of you to ask, my Obamasciple. For that, expect to be invited to my next year's Super Bowl party which will be stocked full of kobe beef flown from Japan at taxpayer's expense. It's a hundred dollars per pound, you know." As Dennis Miller sadly and amusingly pointed out, Miss California Prejean got tougher questions in a beauty contest than the POTUS did at the press conference. I'll get to more about that later.
 
Also today, Obama gave his cheerfully healing quality as a politician who's not going to let petty differences come between us to starving minds. He wasn't going to be divisive, for he's a new type of politician that will bring us all together under the banner of hope and change. In so doing at the town hall in Missouri today he attacked people who attended tea parties. That's so messianic of him. Bush was thought of as this great divider, not a uniter by the left and mainstream media, yet when people protested left and right, sometimes in violent ways, Bush would respectfully say they were exercising their free speech rights. He never talked down to them or spoke ill of them. Many of those protests and protestors were incredibly radical, yet Bush didn't say a negative word about them. On the hundredth day in office, Obama attacked the people who attended these tea parties saying he'd be happy having a discussion on how his healthcare proposal would save Americans money. No he won't. He spoke ill of people with legitimate beefs and concerns and protested peacefully without incident while changing the term "war on terror" to "overseas contingency operation". Changing a terrorist act to "man caused disasters". I guess he also changed terrorist to "a man that causes man caused disasters". I guess he should change Usama bin Laden's name to "a man that is causing men to cause man caused disasters". His DHS report said to look out for vets coming from Iraq and Afghanistan because they might become radicalized and become terrorists. I thought we couldn't use that term anymore, Mr. President? His croney Napolitano released this report to law enforcement and they became bewildered as to how this got leaked out. If people in your own office didn't do it, then law enforcement who is mostly former military personnel would have. DUH! His administration also said to look out for extremists who dare to be pro-life, pro second amendment, and conservative all the while he's bowing to Kings, shaking hands and smiling from ear to ear with dictators. Him and Biden both made fun of Joe "The Plumber" at a stump speech for daring to ask this jerk a legitimate question, but then goes overseas apologizing for everything we've ever done. Did he apologize for our country ending the Soviet Union's tyranny of eastern Europe or defeating the Nazis? Ah, he must have done that off camera. Oh, I bet he did. Yes, he probably still used his teleprompter. Thanks again, dude from the peanut gallery. That's his American Express card. "Don't leave home without it." He would rather speak ill of Americans with legitimate concerns than of terrorists and tyrants. I think that sums up this President with that last line.
 
Obama said he'd be happy having that conversation with those who went to those tea parties over government getting bigger. I think we all can see how he deals with dissenters. He sends his minions out to do his dirty work while being the Manchurian Candidate. The attack of the mainstream media upon the protestors at the tea parties came from the White House. Anyone who doesn't think the mainstream media's coordinated attack didn't come down from someone in the White House is sniffing glue. You don't think the several channels of the mainstream media on tv were a little too ready to throw around that term "teabagging" and "teabaggers" over and over again like it was a seven year old who learned a new curse word? Anderson Cooper went as far to say that the teabaggers might need a dick army. Well I can't speak for all of them Mr. Cooper, but if they need a dick army then what do you need? From the way you look and your demeanor I don't think you've been caught in no man's land on the battlefield yourself. Maybe perhaps before you make a gay joke, maybe you should take off that thong you got on page 6 from the latest Victoria's Secret catalog before you go on the air. If anyone's a bit ac/dc in this conversation, I'd put my money on you and become a rich man. You're about as masculine as Clay Aiken. "They might need a dick army"... like you wouldn't want to become General Custard in that army. Of course this mandate on how to cover the parties came from the White House themselves. The media was too prepared and said too familiar things in order for it not to be.
 
With all of the gay jokes being thrown out there by the mainstream media, where was the homosexual community with their outrage? I didn't hear anything for some strange reason. Oh wait, that's because they're on the same side. That's okay. Just like it's okay for gay activists to be furious with Miss California for her stance on gay marriage, ready to hold her to the fire as if she were Joan Of Arc. Where is this outrage at the President of the United States who holds the same exact view on this same exact issue? Where is that Buster Poindexter on a binge look alike when it comes to Obama? Obama is also opposed to gay marriage. Where are all of these nutty left-wingers on the White House lawn? I don't see them. She was going to be Miss America in a beauty pageant. As Poindexter on a binge said, "I can't have Miss America with that view and represent me". How much you want to bet that he voted for Obama in the last election? Where are the outrageous homosexual radicals that invaded Catholic churches and interrupted services in front of the White House? I don't see them. Can you?
 
This blog is my latest list of grievances from the left. The only thing they are consistent at is being hypocrites. They are definitely consistent about that. At one point, and I'd like some philosopher or mathematician to figure this out for me, wouldn't hypocrisy see the eventuality of correcting itself? Or will it be just one big empty hypocrisy vacuum? That's too perplexing for this mind to even think about. I'd rather listen to music. Speaking of AC/DC, I'm listening to them right now. Their new CD is great. "Rock N Roll Train" is a great tune. Someone else figure out that equation. I think it's beyond calculus. Where's Socrates when you need him?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (22) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SPECTER JUST MADE IT OFFICIAL

Today Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania shocked America by switching from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party. If you were shocked at this, then you're looking at the wrong website. We pretty much all saw this coming. Even if he didn't switch parties, he was disguised as a democrat anyways. This just made it official.
 
Today at his press conference, Specter said it was the rightward movement of the GOP that made him switch parties. Who in the blue hell is he kidding? Woops, am I accusing a politician of lying? Well that might be extremist of me, but DUH! I would like to know where this "turn to the right" was. I'd love to see Mr. Specter to explain further where this sharp turn to the right was. Given that he was first elected in 1980, the GOP since then has taken a sharp turn to the left, not right. As a matter of fact, that's the biggest problem with the GOP. They went left since the old days. As I like to say, both parties have lost their way. The Democratic Party used to be the party of the little guy. Now they're the party of the old hippie. The Republican Party used to be the party of fiscal responsibility. Now they're the old Democratic Party.
 
The actual truth of Specter's official switch is that he's losing in the polls and fundraising to republican frontrunner Pat Toomey. As of March 25th, Toomey was ahead of Specter 41-27% even though 73& of republicans admitted to not knowing much about Toomey. They do know he's further right than Specter. Specter also admitted that PA Governor Ed Rendell told him that he would raise money for him in the upcoming election. That is why Specter officially changed. He was losing and couldn't raise money unless he switched parties. Let me make this clear. This isn't anything like when Joe Lieberman switched from being a democrat to independent in 2006. The reason for that switch is because Ned Lamont ran on one issue. "I'm against the war in Iraq." That not only became his slogan, but his nickname. "Hi, I'm Imagainstthewariniraq Lamont. Pleased to meet you." The Democratic Party's support of Lamont over Lieberman in the primary was the forcing out of Lieberman from their party. The Republican Party didn't force out Specter. That is how the mainstream media will portray this though. I guarantee you that.
 
What is disappointing is the timing. Now the dems will have 60 senators once the fiasco election of Stuart Smalley is made official. Now the dems pretty much have free reign to do what they want. Obama this whole day has been laughing like Emperor Palpatine. There is nothing to stop him anymore. If you think things have gotten bad over the few months Obama's been in office, wait and see what happens now. Specter should have made this switch a long time ago. Leave it to a liberal to switch parties while already being in office. At least Lieberman waited until the election was happening. People knew what Lieberman was doing.
 
The next two years it's going to get as bad as it's going to get. For at least that time, Obama and the party of the old hippie will be able to do just about whatever they want. Usually I would say that would be a good thing since now the country would see in full view what the democrats have become, but America is so dumbed down and this administration is in full "power grab" mode that I don't think they will give it up. With the fascist mainstream media and ACORN registering Mickey Mouse, it would take a huge majority of voters to take power away from these marxists. Is this the beginning of the end? I hope not.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

INVESTIGATING BUSH: WHY OBAMA CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE THIS DISTRACTION

If your head is spinning as to why Obama and those within his administration keep going back and forth on who will be investigated for the CIA "Torturegate", if any investigation is to be made, it's because they're playing a game. Obama himself has said in the past that he's not looking into prosecuting anyone in the Bush Administration on this issue, and that it would be counterproductive. Of course since then. Barackarl has changed his positions time and time again, whether it be from someone like Rahm Emanuel or Obama himself. The truth is if the CIA and the Bush Administration was to be prosecuted, it would bring about an engaging debate with everyone having a point of view. On one side, there will be the center and the right saying Bush and members of his administration shouldn't be prosecuted. The nutty left would be foaming at the mouth and raising Obama's status from messiah to Master of the Universe. Either way, this debate will be something that will garner a lot of attention. Attention away from what Obama's true agenda is.
 
Marxobama is a sick genius, and this is too tempting for him not to take. He doesn't personally want to go after the Bush Administration over this, but he realizes this is exactly what he needs to sneak marxism under the noses of Americans. Even if it hurts the country, or should I say "especially since it hurts this country", Obama is at least getting advice from his marxist advisers that a chance like this will never come up again. There would be no bigger distraction than a previous President being investigated by the Attorney General.
 
I know some might be thinking "yeah but some dems knew about these interrogation techniques. They'll be opening up a big can of worms if they go ahead with this." You think so? Who's in charge of congress? That would be the dems. There might be some token slaps on the wrist to people like Pelosi, but to get marxism put into America they'll take their lashes. Even a bigger gain for Obama would be more praise from the international community. You think he is heralded by the rest of the world now? Think how they'd respond to a full investigation of the Bush Administration. Lord Obama it will be.
 
There is too much attention being paid to the nationalization of banks now. Obama won't take money back from banks who want to give it back. If Obama took their money back, he would not have influence upon them. Now he is forcing banks that don't need money to take money disguised as a stress test, when in fact he's forcing banks to take upon his influence and the nationalization/socialization of those banks. There is too much attention being paid to dissenters. The Tea Parties across the country was so woefully covered that many oblivious Americans saw that coverage and was offended. Most people saw this as a protest against the growing government. Instead it was covered as if these were right-wing nutjobs, racists, and people who didn't want to pay their fair share. I've been on Townhall since September or so, and there has not been one post or comment that I read that disrespected Obama's race. No one really cares what color Obama is here, and this is a conservative website. For this, I am proud of my Townhall brothers and sisters. At any rate, these things are gaining steam and raising concerns. A fever-pitch debate on Bush and his administration being investigated will open the door for Obama while closing the door on dissenting voices on other important matters.
 
I'm not making a guarantee here, but I definitely see Obama looking at this as a worm on a hook that he can't turn away from. Sure it might open Pandora's Box, but to get what he feels he needs to get done, so be it. I will guarantee that they will be putting this talk of investigation out there repeatedly in the days to come. The media will happily devour this. It's a great story and they will be doing their lord's bidding once again. Can Obama afford to let this opportunity go? I don't think so.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (30) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DON'T CALL ME A PROPHET!

My prognosticative abilities are beyond that of Nostradamus. I have friends and the written word alike that can attest to this. I predicted the Cubs would lose the first round of the playoffs last year against the Dodgers. I predicted Mayor Daley of Chicago (or Chicaaahgo as I like to say it) would win in his last election bid, and he did so in stunning fashion. I even predicted I was going to slap my friend senseless seconds before actually doing it. Since my friend isn't too swift, the fulfilling of this prophecy perplexed him. He is now a disciple in Normanism. Don't doubt me as a soothsayer. Many years ago Steve Guttenberg thought he had the world by the tail. I told him not to do that seventh Police Academy movie "Police Academy 7: I'll Show You What To Do With That Night Stick" and that it would hurt his career. He said in verbatim "yeah right. I can't be taken down. I'm Steve Guttenberg, dammit!" Have you heard anything from Mr. Guttenberg lately? I arrest my case.
 
In a few previous blogs I unwittingly made a few jokes that wound up becoming prophecy. Life intimidating art. Here's a list of these prophecies:
 
1. In the blog "President Jesse 'The Mind' Norman As A Liberal Candidate", I made several over-the-top proposals as part of my platform if I ran as a liberal candidate. A few of them will make it on this list. The first one is the funding of the Gloryhole Theme Park. In President Obama's stimulus package, there wound up being funding for a theme park in it. No word if it was for the Gloryhole Theme Park or not. Best way to tell is if in the near future you see Keith Olbermann with worn out knees in his pants or a little something on his chin. How do you like that Keith?
 
2. In that same blog in my Ovarian Mulligan proposal (you golfers know what a Mulligan is), I said that all OBGYN's would be forced to perform abortions no matter their beliefs. If they decided to quit, then they would be shot. The Obama Administration is heavily discussing getting rid of the "Conscience Clause" that allows doctors who have religious or right-to-life beliefs to not perform abortions if they didn't want to. To make doctors perform abortions that they do not believe in giving would make many of them quit or choose to go into another field before even starting. This is not only anti-American to force a doctor to perform an abortion if they do not wish to, but it's about as disgusting of a thing as we can get, not to mention yet another intrusion of this government into our lives. Classy Obama. Classy.
 
3. Again in that blog in the Code Pink law, I would reopen Gitmo for people who have traditional and/or Christian beliefs and speak upon them. Also under this law I said I would drop millions of roses upon those we consider to be our enemies with a hand-written letter of apology from each and every American. President Obama went on a tearful apology spree in Europe and the Middle East. I will dub it the Obama Begs For Forgiveness Tour. He was quicker to apologize and blame the United States on foreign soil than the Waco Kid was at the draw. He bowed so far before Saudi King Abdullah that the King thought he was going to get his shoes spit shined. Also the DHS recently "released" a report to law enforcement to look out for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan because they might get radicalized and become terrorists. They also put forth to look out for extremists. These extremists were categorized this way by the Obama DHS because they are pro-life, pro 2nd amendment, and are conservatives. Ooooooh scary. That's about 50% of America. Coming from an administration that changed the phrase "war on terror" to "overseas contingency operation", I have great skepticism with their views on what a terrorist is. This is the biggest shot the Obama Administration has thrown at his opposition. If this doesn't scare most Americans, then the fruition of Obama's ideals probably won't either. This was such an overt gesture to me..... me? Am I a terrorist? Damn, didn't know that....This was such an overt gesture to America that dissent might no longer be legal in the very near future, but thankfully for this marxist piece of dung (yeah, you Obama) most of America has their heads where the Sun doesn't shine, and it would take a strong kick to the gut to dislodge their heads. Maybe then they'll wake up, but I suggest shampooing first after such a lodging. Remember lather, rinse, repeat.
 
4. In the blog "Palin Makes Media Show Their Hand", which was written on September 6, 2008, I said that the mainstream media would not quit going after Palin even after the election is over. My exact quote was "It's not just that she's a threat to Obama's chance of winning. She's a threat to the entire progressive movement. This is a young, very attractive woman that gives women in middle America an identity. She is a threat to their way of living from their perspective, and I'm not overstating that at all. She must be torn down for the good of all progressives." Looks like I wasn't overstating this at all. The left-wing rabid media is still going after her as if she killed their mother. I guess that would be Michelle. They can't stop themselves because they know of the threat she poses. Maybe she's not even a threat in 2012 to them. 2016 though, look out. Even if she wanted to go away, the mainstream media would not allow her to. The women of middle America probably identify more with her than they do the snobby elitists on the coasts. For this Palin must be made as villainous and foolish as possible. The mainstream media also saw these Tea Parties as a threat to their movement as well. That's why their coverage was so outrageous. They can't have traditional America make a comeback. In so doing, they probably lost more viewers. That's okay to them though. They think they are winning the good fight for their ideology. They don't care if they go down the tubes. There are things that are more important than journalistic fairness and professionalism and making money to the mainstream media. Marxism, fascism, and making sure their Eurotopia comes to America are the most important things to them. I also proposed in that first presidential run blog that I would bailout the mainstream media. They know they can do their work as a diehard Obama front and their lord will not let them go into ruin. There have been a few papers that filed for bankruptcy, but watch for the next joke to come true. Obama will not let go of his press secretaries. The Obama Administration's DHS report and the mainstream media doing his bidding by tearing down those that oppose him are as close to a fascist government this country has ever had. Add that he fired a CEO of a private company and appointed another and you have us becoming ever closer to a fascist, marxist government. Given that this is who he surrounded himself with: Reverend Wright, William Ayers, Bernardine Doehrn, Rashid and Mona Khalidi, Saul Alinsky, and his staffers having posters of Che Guevera on campaign headquarter walls-what did America think they were getting when they elected this man? He will be called by me from now on "Barackarl Marxobama".
 
From Jesse 'The Mind' Norman, Political Blog, Conservative Bloggers, Republican Blogspot, Political Blogs  "Jesse 'The Mind' Norman As A Liberal Candidate" pt. 1 of the series
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (28) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MY 2012 RUN AS PRESIDENT PT. 6 : "THE LEFT DEBATES"

"Hi, I am Keith Olbermann of 'Nobody's Watching With Keith Olbermann'. MSNBC asked me to moderate this debate since I have named Jesse Norman as the Worst Person Of The Day for 147 days in a row. You don't come and fool us like that and not pay a price, Mr. Norman! This is an important townhall styled debate where democrats will be debating with other liberal factions which have broken off into their own parties. This isn't to see who will be the nominee for any party. This is just a debate of ideas as we get into the election season. Representing democrats is our Messiah, King Barack Obama. He has graciously accepted my apologies for betraying him and following Jesse Norman when he fooled us into thinking he was a radical.... I mean common sense liberal. Mr. Obama, I'd say 'god bless you' but you are god. Also representing the democrats is Dan Seals, who is unknown but he looks and sounds exactly like Barack Obama. As a matter of fact, he's likes that. He's hoping to confuse you so much that you vote for him by mistake. Representing the Celebrity Party are Alec Baldwin, Paris Hilton, and Gary Coleman. First question in the audience comes from a Mr. Joseph Myles of Topeka, Kansas. His question is to Mr. Obama. Now Mr. Myles, make sure your question to our lord is about his suit, okay?"
 
Joseph Myles: "Oh, absolutely. Mr. Obama, who did your suit?"
 
Barack Obama: "It's good you asked that... stop moving the prompter please. Okay, there you go. It's good you asked that question Mr. Jiles. It was done by ... keep it moving quicker please. Ah. It's a Versace. I thank you for the question, Mr. Kyles."
 
Joseph Myles: "Oh, one more question..."
 
Barack Obama: "Arrest him!"
 
Keith Olbermann: "Yes, arrest him. Please audience, do not deviate from the questions provided for you or there will be consequences. Second question comes from Ireland Baldwin, and it goes to Alec Baldwin."
 
Ireland Baldwin: "Hi dad."
 
Alec Baldwin: "Hi pig... I mean hi sweetie."
 
Ireland Baldwin: "Since you are running for President, I'd like to know what have you ever done to make you qualified for the Office?"
 
Alec Baldwin: "Don't embarass me now, hon. My wrath will be terrible. You want me to answer that question? Okay, I'll answer it. I have done more than our President before he became President, and he won. That's my answer."
 
The audience nods in unison.
 
Keith Olbermann: "Jesse, I hate you. Just wanted to say that. Next question is from a man calling himself Herpes Contractus From Paris. Are you Greek, sir? Anyway his question is to Paris Hilton."
 
Herpes Contractus: "Do you remember me?"
 
Paris Hilton: "No, should I have?"
 
Herpes Contractus: "We had sex two weeks ago."
 
Paris Hilton: "Hmm... nope, doesn't ring a bell."
 
Herpes Contractus: "We did it on camera?"
 
Paris Hilton: "Oh, you're going to have to be more specific than that for crying out allowed."
 
Herpes Contractus: "You made me wear that Chihuahua costume."
 
Paris Hilton: "Nnnnnope, still going to have to be more specific. Wait! Did we meet in Vegas?"
 
Herpes Contractus: "Yes. I'm the one."
 
Paris Hilton: "Well that just narrowed it down to seven, but go ahead. What's your question?"
 
Herpes Contractus: "Do you see my lips? Look at what you did! I'll never be able to kiss a woman again!" Security starts to take him away. "I look like I've been stuck in the desert for a week! Look at my lips for heaven's sake! Someone stop that woman. She'll infect the whole country!" Paris nods as he's being taken away. "Stop her! Someone please stop her! Look at my liiiiips!"
 
Keith Olbermann: "Ahem, well that was interesting. I'd be interested in Ms. Hilton myself except I still have a knot on the top of my head from the last time I was in the Oral ... I mean Oval Office. Next question comes from ousted Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Her question goes to President Obama. Remember Mrs. Clinton, Chelsea is being held captive so make sure you stick to the format."
 
Hillary Clinton: "Barack, please let my daughter go. When are you going to let her go?"
 
Barack Obama: "When I give GM back to the public. MOOHAHAHAHAHA! So consider her mine. You should have known better than to go against my 'give the nukes to Iran' program. Didn't that program keep Iran from manufacturing nukes?"
 
Hillary Clinton: "Yeah, because they didn't need to manufacture them anymore. You gave them our nukes."
 
Barack Obama: "That's not what I asked. You can't argue with the results. My administration stopped Iran from making nukes. It was a total success."
 
Keith Olbermann: "Well said, lord Obama. We didn't like Israel anyway. They had it coming. Next question goes to Gary Coleman from someone named Guido Narducci."
 
Guido Narducci: "Yo, Gary. When we hired you to do commercials for us, namely Guido's Cement Shoes And Fourth Floor Casino, we didn't think you'd rack up thirty large on Paulie's game. When are you gonna come tru for us?"
 
Gary Coleman: "That's going to be a problem. My father, Mr. Drummond has cut me off. He said I have a quote, unquote gambling problem. Here's the keys to his Park Avenue apartment. Take what you want except for Mrs. Garret. I'm banging her. Oh, whatchu talkin' about, America!"
 
Keith Olbermann: "Hahaha. Thanks, Mr. Coleman. I love that line. Was wondering when you were going to do it. The next question will be the last and then we'll get to some closing statements. Last question goes to Dan Seals from a Bizarro Superman."
 
Bizarro Superman: "You stole my gimmick. You stole it except you didn't become Obama's opposite. You became just like him. What's the point? If you're going to steal my gimmick, then stick to it. Don't ruin it. They threatened to kill me off because of you. If you weren't an evil, radical democrat like myself that hates truth, justice, and the American way, I'd kill you."
 
Dan Seals: "Uhh hope, change, yes we can, shooting stars, purple horseshoes, lucky charms. That's all I got."
 
Keith Olbermann: "Okay, now to our closing statements. Mr. Obama, you are first. You are also last. You are Alpha and Omega. Your closing statement, Sir."
 
Barack Obama: "When I first became President, we were in a $1.3 trillion deficit. Thanks to my administration we have gotten it up to $3.8 trillion. Our debt is at just over $16 trillion thanks to my administration. We have turned the dollar into the peso. Many say it couldn't be done. I did it. Many said we wouldn't come up with a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian situation. By giving Iran nuclear weapons and shooting down Israel's countermeasures, we now have a solution to that crisis. Many said that America couldn't be brought down to its knees. I did it. Many said that... which teleprompter do you want me to look at? Well stop pointing to that one. You know I can't speak without my teleprompter... Many said that we wouldn't stop illegal immigration. Thanks to me, now Mexico has a problem with illegal immigration consisting of Unites States citizens. All of these things people say couldn't be done, but I did it. Yes we can. In my next term, we will change the US flag from the Stars and Stripes to the Hammer and Sickle. Yes we can. We will use DNA technology to bring back to life Karl Marx and Che Guevera. Yes we can. Yes we can, America. Yes we can. Thank you."
 
Keith Olbermann: "Okay, the last closing statement goes to Paris Hilton."
 
Paris Hilton: "Hello... is this still America?"
 
An audience member yells "good question" before he is shot by ACORN representatives.
 
Paris Hilton: "Whoa, that was cool! Anyway, I don't know who that guy was from before. Those lips were grody. Ewww. To expect me to remember someone I had sex with would be like asking Keith Olbermann how many pants he wore the knees out of at the Gloryhole Theme Parks. Impossible to answer in other words. I've lost fourteen dogs this month alone. I do think I'd make a good Precedent, though. I could come up with a solution to the neverending cola wars. Mr. Obama hasn't done that. I can talk without a television. Mr. Obama can't. Well I can't read so I can't use a television when speaking. And I don't have a mean pastor like Obama had because I have never been inside a church. When I try to, the Earth quakes and the holy water boils. Remember America, nobody has more experience  off their feet than I do. I will be a good Precedent. Vote for me. Don't worry about me. I will register to vote for real this time. Thank you... this is still America right?"
 
Yes, that is a good question Paris. Will it still be America when election season warms up for 2012? Just when you thought I was finished doing these, BAM! I come out with another one. Stay tuned until the next installment.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (26) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567891011Next »