After a two-year study done at prestigious Purdue University in my homestate of Indiana led by Professor Ayhan Irfanoglu (civil engineering), the findings support the government's account of why the Twin Towers came down. Sorry nuts. Bush didn't do it afterall. The steel which supported both structures were not made fireproof, which is now code in all structures being built today. Purdue is near the top, if not the top engineering school in the whole world and a two-year study showed their due diligence in this case. They used 3-D animation and a state of the art computer program to detail what would happen to the Twin Towers in the wake of the event of 9/11.

Half of the building's weight were in the columns, which were concentrated at the cores of the towers. The steel, which was not fireproof melted. "When that happens, the whole structure comes down" said Irfanoglu. He also said "if the columns were more distributed, maybe, the fire could not take them out so easily." Because the steel and concentration of weight was in the middle of the building, and the steel melted, the whole structure would come straight down because the outsides of the building would have to go down with the middle. So what happened to the 550 professors and scholars who founded the "Scholars For 9/11 Truth"? They came out quickly after 9/11 to say 9/11 was done by controlled demolition. What will be their explanation of this finding? I bet they will be pretty silent for a while.

This is a classic example of people who think they are much smarter than they actually are. Their ego drives them to not see what everyone else sees. That way they aren't like everyone else. The "common man". The "common man" is stupid and uneducated in their eyes, so therefore they HAVE TO see things differently. If they don't, then they will be like the "common man". Their ego just can't accept such a proposition. To these people history never happened. What I mean by that is there is no historical event that can't be debunked by effort in tearing down history's account of events. No matter how solid history's account is, to help them feel smarter they make up their version of history. If these people try hard enough, they can somehow make sense that there really is no United States of America. That we are still an extension of Brittania. I don't have to tell you that there really is a United States, do I? 

Let me clue you 9/11 conspiracy nuts in on something. History has happened. Much of it just the way we learned about it in school. Most things did not have alternative endings or hidden secrets that you think you are the only one to know about. You're not part of some minute group of people who have unlocked the real secrets behind history. You're not the Templar Knights. Some things just happened. Accept it. How do we get at this point in time if history didn't just happen? Anyone can break down a historical event even if history's account is accurate. Anyone can do it. It doesn't make you any smarter than everybody else I'm sorry to say. You're wasting your time and twisting your mind just to feed your ego. From what I've seen over the last ten years or so, this is a buffet you all have been munching on, too. What will be your dessert of a conspiracy theory? One has to wonder.

This goes to prove that these scholars and professors really know nothing more than the everyday person. They might know more in that concentrated area, but overall they are no smarter than Joe Shmoe. Unlike Joe Shmoe though, they have to try to outthink every damned thing that goes on. We all saw the planes crash into the Twin Towers. No one reported any CIA guys putting explosives into the Twin Towers beforehand. No one saw a second explosion in these buildings that would be indicative of a controlled demolition. When they show buildings being demolished, we see the explosions inside the building. Did you see the second explosions in the Twin Towers just before they came down? Neither did I. Where was the demolition's control station if it was a demolition? Aie aie aie, this one is just too easy. I guess that's the problem with these idiot 9/11 Truthers. It is too easy. Will those who see this report say "okay, we were wrong"? Hell no they won't. They will either say Purdue was threatened by the Bush Administration to go along with their account, or they will try to find the smallest part of that report to twist and say "see, we told you so! Bush did it!"