About Me

Name: Jesse "The Mind"...
Email: jno2179536@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

THE LOST CORRUPTIBLE

Greetings to those who read this. May God open your eyes and ears as you read on. In this wicked generation, too many do not even have willing eyes and ears. People refuse to acknowledge the first part of wisdom, that is to fear God. The ultimate irony is usually people have fear of the unknown. The soul denyers have no fear of what they don't know, but they definitely should. Even forsaking their judgment, they bring onto themselves great treachery before their ultimate arrival. Those with no spiritual center will revolve around anything carrying its own weight. Those with no moral compass will hover around plagues of ambiguity to their own undoing and end. In this era, those carrying their own weight believe they are their own personal god. They go on projecting their self-made gospel which attracts the cult of the spiritual empty. This is no more true than in life in today's world. People become zombie-like followers of the new logic in which right and wrong have no roles to play. It doesn't even have to be an actual person, but an ideology as well. The self-made gods and doctrine then have their own disciples which are willing to sink with the ship blindly headed for the stormiest seas.
 
Most soul denyers are personal geniuses which claim they know everything there is to know under the Sun, but they deny something which is at no distance away from them. They do not ask themselves a simple question: "why do I have a conscience?" Well they do ask silently in the confines of their own mind to which their reply is to then compromise with what their conscience tells them to do. On this destructive journey, the conscience gets whittled down to a splinter. Because it is their soul, they cannot remove it altogether but the voice is merely a shadow in their thoughts. When those ignore their wrongs and their conscience telling them about it, no matter if their view is "the ends justify the means", they will eventually become the lost. That is unless they finally look in that mirror and see themselves honestly for what they've become. Far too many do not. Instead they become the lost. The lost then have become corruptible. A dandelion waiting for someone willing to pull it out of the ground and carry it away without reverence.
 
The splinter that used to be their soul/conscience acts just as a splinter would in their minds and hearts. The person doesn't only not feel good, but right. Instead of looking back to correct their wrongs, they look for ways to cover up the way they feel. The hardheaded would rather continue on their destructive path than admit they're wrong. One of the most sad testimonies of today's world. These people go on a personal quest to do what feels good to counteract what feels bad. They also camoflauge the bad feelings by coming up with cliches which really mean nothing. "Live without regrets". What massive ego must one to have to believe they are above regret? How conceited must a person be to think that people are to be treaded upon without looking down by their feet? There are some who are half-heartedly apologetic, but they reduce people down to be lessons to learn from while not making amends. Still they go on with their chins stridently up and continuing on being what they've turned themselves into, thus proving they've learned nothing. Their flawed logic doesn't come up with the statement that more wrongdoing is much worse than admitting you're wrong and making amends. There is much worse than admitting your wrongs and feeling bad for them. Forgiveness is a powerful tool, which would allow for all parties to move on. The satisfaction of living, learning, and making amends greatly outweighs the guilt one would feel for admitting their sins. This is something anyone with a willing eye and ear will easily understand.
 
This life is a short one, and at any time either you or the person you've wronged can be taken away. Without a moment's notice, your last impression left on a person can be something you'd do anything to take back. Who is willing to allow such a weight on their conscience? The lost who would rather go on as if there's nothing to answer for? Those unwilling to look one second in the mirror to see the questioning eyes looking right back at them? The eyes which ask "what are you doing to me?" Once their life or yours is over, you cannot go back and make amends. You've become a master stonecarver leaving an everlasting impression on them, and ultimately on yourself. You may not be able to make amends, but you will have to answer for your wrongs. Those you've wronged and didn't make amends with will be witnesses testifying in your hearing with the Holy Spirit as their evidence. As is written, fire will test every person's work. Even Christians will have their works tested. Will they offer gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, or stubble? Will you look for those you hovered around and explain to those who've brought their case against you that it's really their fault and not yours? Will you say "I listened to him" or "this ideology"? Will you say "everybody was doing it" or "everybody was like that then"? Will you expect anyone including God to give you a pass for saying these things? If you do, then your "lost" will be forever corrupted. Do not make this your destiny. It's so easy to correct. The price you'll pay is beyond anything you can imagine. God bless everyone of you.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (27) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ENTER THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, BUT NOT EVERLASTING LIFE?

In the "sermon on the mount", Jesus refers to the kingdom of heaven and what it takes to get there. He says that it’s harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. The eye of a needle was actually a nickname for one of the entrances into Jerusalem’s temple walls, but nevertheless he says through God all is possible. That right there should tell people willing to look that there might be a difference between the kingdom of heaven and everlasting life. If one goes to Jesus, rich or not, they will have everlasting life. Nowhere does it say you have to believe upon Jesus to get into the kingdom of heaven. Jesus explains what it takes to get there in the sermon on the mount. Men with their incompetence refused to look into that there was possibly a difference between everlasting life and the kingdom of heaven, even though Jesus did say that heaven and Earth shall pass away. In place there will be a new heaven and a new Earth. Jesus also said in his father's house there are many mansions. That word "mansions" in the original Greek is the word "μονη" (moh-nee), which really means a residence or resting place. Heaven as it stands now is just a temporary holding place for those who've lived their lives honorably, including those who believed in our Messiah. Knowing there is a difference between everlasting life and the kingdom of heaven will answer that question that atheists and doubters love to bring up, “if no one has ever heard of Jesus, why can’t they get into heaven?”

In order to achieve everlasting life, one must go through Jesus. God will not judge against those who are not held accountable for what they don’t know. If they live their lives the way Jesus described in the sermon on the mount, even if they never heard of him, they will get to the kingdom of heaven after their death. There will be a time for them to make that choice in the future, which I will get to later. Those who have lived their lives wickedly will not get into the kingdom of heaven, but at some point in the future can find themselves making the right choice and achieving everlasting life after they have learned their lesson. They are the ones who are called "the dead" in Revelation 20 who live not again until the thousand years are done. Every single time when the term "everlasting life" is mentioned, it talks about believing upon our Lord. So why the difference in what it takes to get to the kingdom of heaven and what it takes to achieve everlasting life? Because it's two different things.

There is another age after this one, as I’ve written many times before. When Jesus returns, as is written in the original Greek, he will end this age. Not the world. In Matthew when it speaks of the end of the world, in each instance that word in the original Greek wasn’t “cosmos”. It was “αιων” (ahee-OWN), which is their word for age. There are times in Matthew when the word “world” is cosmos in the original Greek, but when it speaks of the end of the world, it’s always “αιων”, so there's a reason why he used different words despite the translation of the KJV. Without the knowledge that Jesus' return only ends this age, Revelation 20 cannot be made sense of. Keeping in mind that when Jesus returns he ends this age, go read Revelation 20 again and you will get a very new sense of it. The correct sense I am hoping ;)  

It will be then when those who haven’t made a choice or those who’ve made the wrong choice will have to make it. The ones who made the wrong choice or lived their lives wickedly will not live again until the thousand years are fulfilled. They are called “the dead”. Satan will be loosened from his bottomless pit prison and will try to deceive the world once again. Those he deceives then will lose their last chance at showing their faith to God. Everyone will know the right choice, but as is written even at the end of this age the mystery of God will be finished at the blowing of the seventh trump and still many will fall. It will be the same case at the end of the next and last age.

Now when someone mocks you for your beliefs or genuinely asks you that question about those who never had a chance to choose Jesus as the Christ how they will get to heaven, now you have your answer. Traditional teaching has failed at this probably as much as they’ve failed at anything else about God’s word. It’s amazing how many of them have refused to ask such a simple question, “is there a difference between the kingdom of heaven and everlasting life?” Without ideological blinders, you can now see there truly is a difference between the two.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHRIST'S LAST MOMENTS ON THE CROSS

One of the more puzzling things written in the Bible are during Christ’s last moments when he said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” For some reason the traditional explanation is that this was Christ’s moment of doubt and pain. If that were the case, then he would have sinned. To accuse God of forsaking them is a sin for anyone. I know some will say “Jesus couldn’t sin”, but that’s foolish. That’s also shortchanging his painstaking life and death to say that he didn’t have the ability to sin. To pay such a heavy price of the sins of our creation, it wouldn’t be right if God cheated and made it to where his Messiah didn’t have the ability to sin. Plus, Satan did tempt Jesus in the desert. Why tempt someone that didn’t have the ability to sin? Why would Satan waste his breath? Satan knew exactly who Jesus was and knew he had the ability to sin. How many of you has he come to and offered all of the kingdoms of the world to? None.

So why wasn’t what Jesus said on the cross a sin? The genius of what Jesus was referring to is beyond amazing. Jesus saying "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" was designed to make a wise person ask why that wasn't a sin. As long as they aren’t too influenced by the traditional teaching of men, the question is designed to make them hunt for the answer. He wasn't talking to God, and I'll prove it. “He said ‘my God, why hast thou forsaken me”, so of course he was talking to God.” Well, actually that isn’t the case at all.

What Jesus did by saying that on the cross was to fulfill scripture. What scripture? Psalm 22. Psalm 22 starts off by saying “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” It’s been there the whole time. Read that psalm down to verse 16 and it says “For dogs have compassed me, the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me; they pierced my hands and my feet.” That is how Christ died. He had his hands and feet pierced, did he not? When were the psalms written? Most, if not all of the psalms were written by King David around 1000 BC. This was written a thousand years before Christ was on the cross. What is more amazing is when you really analyze that whole thing, the Jews knew nothing of crucifixion until the Romans came in 76 BC. This was written around nine hundred years before that. Psalm 22 is obviously the prophecy of the Messiah’s last moments. Only the truly blind will say it is not after reading it, which I had one try to tell me not too long ago, but that was more like a man that would not admit he's wrong. The willfully blind.

Why Jesus didn’t sin when he said that on the cross was because he wasn’t talking to God at all. He was fulfilling scripture. He was saying Psalm 22 is him. That shows how genius Psalm 22 even is. It’s supposed to, when Jesus repeats it on the cross, make us ask “why wasn’t that a sin?” So it’s up to us to find the answer somewhere.

Not only does it prove Jesus was the Messiah, to which no decent explanation by an atheist can come up with as a counter, but it also brings the Old and the New Testaments together. It proves there must be a prophetic author. It proves that both books are written by God through the Holy Spirit and out of His elect. Just by that psalm and what Jesus said on the cross proves all of these things beyond any skeptic’s analytical power attempting to tear it down. They can’t do it. Point this out to them and see if they can. Watch them scramble and struggle to find an answer for this. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE AUTHENTIC BIBLICAL HISTORY OF SATAN

Some people hear “Lucifer” and “Satan” and just think those are the names of the devil and don’t even question why. There is a huge difference between the two names and when they were his names. When taking all of this in with the meaning of his names, it can provide you a whole lot of wisdom about not just him, but about us and why we are here. That’s a trip for you to take if you decide to though. I cannot go any further than where this post ends.

In the KJV and other translated versions of the Bible, for some reason they mistranslated the word "Lucifer". Lucifer in the Hebrew is actually Helel (hay-LALE). If you open a Hebrew OT, it would read in the Hebrew "Helel", not Lucifer. The definition of it is “morning star”. Only one time does the Bible mention the word Helel, or “Lucifer”. That is in Isaiah 14:12. There’s a reason for that. It mentions what Helel’s crime was, in which he was banished from God and sentenced to everlasting torture. It says Helel exalted himself above all of the other stars of God and tried to be the god of the congregation. Helel was Satan’s name before he committed his crime.

Satan in the Hebrew means “the opponent” or “adversary”. There’s a reason for that too. Satan is what he became after his crime. He was the morning star, and now he’s the adversary. Since the days of Adam, he has been known as Satan. The reason why he’s mentioned as Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12 is because that’s what he was known as when he committed this crime. Since the days of Adam, Satan has been the adversary. People don’t trace back what is written in Revelation 20:2 back to the serpent written of in Genesis with Adam and Eve. “And he laid hold on the dragon, THAT OLD SERPENT, which is the devil and Satan and bound him for a thousand years.” What was John of Patmos referring to?

Ba’al was a fertility god of the pagans, but was he more than that? In Elijah’s time, Ba’al was the great opponent god and Jezebel was the chief pagan prophetess. As Paul reiterates the conversation between Elijah and God in Romans 11, he adds something that really puts traditional teaching into question. As is written, God tells Elijah “I have reserved to myself 7000 men who have not bowed the knee to Ba’al.” Traditional teachers have said that God meant there were 7000 people living in Israel who did not bow the knee to this pagan god. That’s wrong. If God reserves to himself a person, it means that that particular person has not lived yet. Proof of that is what Paul said afterward. “Even so at this present time there is also a remnant according to the election of grace.” A remnant. That means there are still some left. Elijah lived around 900 BC. Paul wrote this around 900 years afterward. There couldn’t be any living still if the traditional teachers are correct. God reserves to himself a person by not letting them live. In that particular conversation God meant that He has reserved to Himself 7000 men (and women) for the last generation. When else? Another secret to all of this is what Ba’al truly was. Ba’al may have been the pagan god of fertility, but he was also the deity of Venus. Lucifer means the morning star. What is the morning star? Venus is. Take it from there. I cannot go any further. I wish you luck.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (15) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE REAL CHRISTMAS STORY

Even though people widely accept that Jesus, our Saviour was born on or close to December 25th, this is not really the case. When Jesus was born, it is written there were shepherds tending to their flocks at night. This would have only been done during the Harvest Moon. That would be right around late September. What the significance of December 25th is that it may have been the date Jesus was conceived by God. It would have been right around that time in order for him to be born right at the time of the Harvest Moon, so there is some significance of this date. This is the real miracle, right? Not the virgin birth, but the conception of a virgin. If a virgin is pregnant, she’s going to give birth. The miracle may have happened on December 25th, but Jesus was not born anywhere around that date.  Just one of those things Christians should know.

Many intellectuals claim that Christians stole Christmas from the pagans and took the tradition of decorating the tree from them also. That is only partly correct. The pagans did decorate their winter holiday trees, but they also worshipped them. Christians do not worship the trees they set up and decorate. Christians also give gifts to loved ones traditionally to honor what the three wise men did when they brought the baby Jesus gold, frankincense, and myrrh. Maybe many of them have lost the idea of that, but that’s how the tradition started.

Just thought it would be a good idea to set a couple of things straight as the anniversary of the conception of Christ comes. Merry Christmas everyone, and have a happy New Year. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE ATTACK UPON GOD

The attacks upon God and those who believe in Him are becoming more sharp and mainstream in recent years. What these so-called personal geniuses don’t realize is that they are fulfilling scripture by doing so. I hear these masters of the universe say the darnedest things with such fervor and authority about things they know nothing about. They always have to add that little shot to those who believe, especially Christians, saying that they are uneducated and believe in just an adult Santa Claus myth. Nothing like putting those down that disagree. I don’t mind taking shots or giving them much, but those I give the shots to have cast the first stone.

Atheists are prideful hypocrites who say they are for equal treatment and harmony among all of creation, when in fact they want to be recognized by everyone else as being the great thinkers of our time and never miss an opportunity to try to get under the skin of their Christian coinhabitants. They try as hard as they can to stick out from amongst the crowd with their middle-child syndrome. They especially use Christian holidays to make sure that they are heard. Anyone that says they are insulted or offended at God being referred to in our currency or a nativity scene displayed by a town or city during Christmas season is lying to you. One can’t look at a dollar bill and get irate. One can’t look at people praising someone they believe to be their Saviour and feel like they’ve had their faces spat upon. This is their way of letting you know they are smarter than you because they don’t believe in God. They believe in evolution.

The intellectuals and atheists are big believers in evolution. That is their reason for being. This is their god, whether they like to think of it this way or not. Evolution is their god. The supreme prophet of the Evolution god was Darwin. A prophet who didn’t even believe the theory he proposed himself. With this belief, it allows them to live their life without restriction. Why have restrictions when there is nothing to answer for after their lives are done? This is a benefit for their belief. Possibly even an excuse to not use their own willpower to do things their conscience tells them not to do. “If there’s no God, I don’t have to listen to my conscience. My conscience is just my mind playing tricks on me, mastered by the society of the feebleminded believers who think certain things are wrong. My conscience does not exist.”

The sad thing is that their belief in evolution has questions that they can’t answer themselves. I used to frustrate fifty year old adults when I was a teenager before I even read the Bible with my questions to them. I would ask them questions like “if evolution is real, then how come there are still cockroaches?” The best answer I got was “well some evolved and some didn’t.” I thought evolution was constant. Why would some of the species evolve but some not? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. There should not be dogs, birds, fish, mosquitos, or bears. If evolution really exists, then there should be at the most only a few species below us on Earth right now. Evolution is evolved. Evolved is evolution. Another question I asked was “if the Earth is four billion years old, is that enough time for an amoeba to make it all the way to a human considering there are well over a million different types of insect alone?” Seeing years of things they perceived to be facts erode on their faces was pretty sad to see. They didn’t like me much, those intellectuals, but they knew I was no fool. I heard one say “well there are different classes of species and that’s how it happened”. Well, how did they divide into those classes? What decision making ability was there to say “I’m going to turn into this now”? If a species adapts to that climate or environment, how do they change themselves? What creature was the first that said “I need a digestive system so I can nourish myself and excrete waste”, and then do it? If the first species to have nourishment from eating ate, they would die without a way to excrete the waste. That would be the end of that new species. For those who claim they are supergeniuses to the Nth degree, these questions they have not asked themselves doesn’t speak well of their thinking ability. Maybe they do think of those questions, but since this is their belief and it’s not in God, they’d rather just let it rest there and not wonder about things they don’t have the answers to. Willingly blinding themselves from their own accusation upon those they disagree, that Christians cannot think for themselves. Evolution is proof they cannot think very well. The true intellectual is the true fool. Even Bill Maher, who never fails to insult Christians, believes in evolution but admits something must have happened to get life started. DUH! Albert Einstein is known as maybe the smartest man in the last century, and he believed in God. He even went as far as to say that if anyone can look into the dark reaches of space and the glorious nature on Earth, and not realize there was a God to create it all is blind.

A favorite attack of these atheists and intellectuals upon those that believe in God say that there have been more people killed in the name of religion than anything else combined. Hogwash. Religion is just an excuse. Racism is at the crux of the matter when it comes to killing by the masses. Racism is the true reason. Religion, no matter what religion it is, is always the excuse. Before there were Irish Catholics and Protestants fighting eachother, there were the red and black Irish fighting. Before there were Sunni and Shiite, there were Arabs and Persians fighting. Look up your history. I know, again this is too easy to come up with, which reiterates my point that the true intellectual is the true fool.

Atheists say “how can you believe in something you can’t see?” I believe in love, but I’ve never seen love. I see the evidence of love everywhere, just as I see the evidence of God everywhere. Love cannot be seen by anyone. I know many atheists say that the Judeo-Christian God is invisible, like it’s written that He is somewhere in the Bible. Actually Moses saw God, but only from behind as God walked into the sanctuary as Moses and the Israelites roamed through the wilderness. Moses was not allowed to see God’s face, but he saw Him. Nowhere does it say God is invisible.

If an atheist is truly enquiring, then it’s good to talk about things of God. If you know things pretty assuringly, then speak with some authority. If you’re a product of traditional teaching, then I don’t suggest doing this because I can ask questions about your belief you cannot answer as well. This world is NOT seven thousand years old. Dinosaurs truly existed many thousands of years ago. Don’t let any traditional teacher fool you in stating otherwise. If an atheist is there to just rile you up and get under your skin by belittling what you believe in, then don’t cast your pearls. If they cannot admit the existence of their own conscience which is at no distance away from them, they aren’t ready to hear of the Truth far above their heads. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'TIS THE SEASON

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, 'tis the season to hear of stories of people and government alike who wish to take the Christ out of Christmas and discard traditional celebrations which have done no one any harm for hundreds of years. The ACLU (Anti-Christian Legislation Union) has gone town to town suing on behalf of nobody to take down all references to Christmas as a religious holiday. Usually it's small towns who can't afford going to court to explain why public displays of Christianity during Christmas season is fine. Since they don't have the money, the small town legislators usually cave in to the ACLU. More attacks on small town America. The ACLU was once an organization that really fought for individual rights. Now their whole existence is based on tearing Christianity from the clutches of America's strong arms. Much alike the NOW and other women's rights groups have evolved over time from being organizations that fought for women's rights to only fighting for abortion rights, the ACLU has evolved into a despicable organization that has become small town America's schoolyard bully. I can just picture an ACLU lawyer on the morning of Black Friday getting his coffee and paper with a huge smile on his face as he kisses his wife. She asks "why such a big smile?" He says "it's Christmas season. It's time to take away a town's right to celebrate it how they see fit. It's going to be a good season this year. I love my job."
 
The ACLU has been silent on Joe "the plumber" Wurzelbacher's case. As everyone knows, Joe asked the Obamessiah a question to which Obama gave the wrong answer to. Helen Jones-Kelley, the head of Ohio Dept. Of Jobs And Family Services looked into Joe's personal information SUPPOSEDLY without consent. She has been suspended with pay. She at first said she only looked at a couple of things of Joe's. The facts proved otherwise. She was obsessed with Joe The Plumber as was the media. Just as scornful as the media, too. Jones-Kelley, a democrat who gave the maximum to Obama's campaign violated Wurzelbacher's rights, but she wasn't the only one in the state of Ohio. Matter of fact, I'm sure we'll never get the full story of how many looked or who was behind it, but you can rest assured you won't hear a peep from the ACLU on this matter. Joe said on "The O'Reilly Factor" that the ACLU has not called him since he's considering on suing Jones-Kelley and the state of Ohio. If he does, he will win. He definitely should. That's outrageous, but what can you expect from those on the left? "We'll fight for individual rights unless you don't agree with our views."
 
I'm waiting in the future for an idiot to propose dumb solutions to the whole "attack on Christmas" problem that they think would make both sides happy. Perhaps someone will propose that they change the spelling of Christmas to "Chrismas". "If you take the 't' out, we can all celebrate the holiday in peace!" I'm sure the secular-progressives would love that idea. People on the fence who don't fight for anything in their lives would probably go along with it. Those damn French-Americans. Yeah, they'd be okay with it. The rest of America would be ticked off, which would be about two-thirds of the population. As the ACLU and the far-left says, the minority rules. They'll also replace nativity scenes with people from all races in peace symbol t-shirts surrounding a baby Obama in the manger. Yeah, the ACLU would go for that. The media will be the ones to propose the idea. The stealing of the baby Obama from a nativity scene would receive the death penalty. Child molestors and murderers don't deserve it, but anyone disparaging the Obamessiah will have it coming. "You stole the baby Obama?! How sick and low can you be?" "Oh, I had sex with this seven year old once too." "Whoa, let's not skate over this stealing the baby Obama thing so quickly!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (10) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AMERICA, THE NEW BABYLON PT. 2

First of all, I would like to say that I am happy for all of the black Americans out there. I say "black Americans" because most didn't actually move here from Africa. I like what Smokey Robinson said, "I'm not an African-American. I didn't come from Africa. I'm black." I am sincerely happy for blacks in this country because now they have reached the highest plateau in our country. Now they can tell their children that they can become whatever they want and point to President Obama as an example. I do understand how important that really is. I wished he had lost, but I am happy that we have crossed that road in our country. Just forty years ago blacks in this country were fighting to be equal and not segregated. Now there is a black President. That time is overdue, but it has come. So for that, I congratulate the black Americans in this country. I hope this inspires all of you to realize your potential and pass it on to your children. God bless the black people in this country. Your day of not reaching the ceiling is over. Now run with it.
 
Now the lovefest is over though : )   For a few weeks now I decided to listen to my gut on this election and realized that Obama would become President. I should have bowed to my instinct months ago. As a matter of fact, I should have even predicted that Obama would pick Joe Biden to be his running mate. I had my eyes on Biden since he wanted to partition Iraq into three countries. Why I did was because of the prophecy of Isaiah 18:1-3 which I have understood for many years to be about our country and Iraq. We are the land shadowing with wings (bald eagle is our symbol) beyond the rivers of Ethiopia. Ethiopia back then was a very big country and mostly in a different place than it is now. It used to be the westernmost country in Africa. If the Bible had a name for this land, it would have said it. Instead all it said was that this land was beyond the rivers of Ethiopia. We are the country that will send our ships swiftly across the sea. More proof of the land the Bible was talking about was a yet to be discovered one. We are the nation that lifted a sign in the mountains with Mount Rushmore, which was finished in 1941. Right when we entered WWII and then became a superpower. It told the world to listen to everything this country says and pay attention to everything this country does after the sign in the mountains is up. That certainly happened. Iraq is the country that will be meted out and trodden down. They are the people terrible (actual translation is “fearful”) from their beginning. That was code for the Babylonians. Babylon is in Iraq today. They are the ones that will have spoiling rivers with the Euphrates and Tigris. I know traditional teaching says that this prophecy was about something that happened a long time ago, but I just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt it hasn’t happened. The Bible would have named the land in Isaiah 18:1 if this land had a name. Joe Biden just a couple of years ago said he wanted to divide Iraq into three parts. This was thought of as a bad idea, but when things were going terribly in Iraq he came up with this idea. Obama has promised to pull troops out no matter what is said to him by anyone. If things get really bad again after we’re gone, Obama has vowed he would send the troops back. That’s where Biden will come in. Iraq will be divided just as it says in Isaiah 18:2. What will happen to the US is unclear although it will be much worse than 9/11. It says “woe to” America when we send our ambassadors to Iraq after it is divided. Since 9/11 isn’t written anywhere, this will be much worse. No matter how you feel about the warn in Iraq, we were destined to go in. It’s written. It was inescapable. I told all of my friends many years ago that we were not done with Iraq because of those verses.
 
As I wrote in the first "America, The New Babylon", people would vote against their best interests because we are a very confused country right now. Just as the Babylonians were millennia ago, we don't know what is up or what is down. To prove that just look at the polls. When Americans were asked who was more prepared to be President, McCain won overwhelmingly. Americans also realize the importance of the time we're living in right now. When asked who would be better to handle a crisis, national or international, McCain again won overwhelmingly. When asked who was more patriotic, McCain again won overwhelmingly. When asked who was better to handle the economy, Obama won but when asked if taxes should be raised on ANYONE right now, 65% of Americans voted no. Is your head swirling? Mine is, because the only way I can make sense of these polls is that we are incredibly confused right now. There is no other explanation because the results from those questions have no linear thought to Obama becoming President with over five million votes to spare. People can blame Bush for being incompetent, which I have as well, but over 60% of Americans in an AOL poll a while back know that McCain wasn't anything like Bush. We have become the new land of confusion. That does not bode well for our future.
 
As it says in Isaiah 18, "woe to the country shadowing with wings". Our woe is very near. The end of the age (not world as is written in the original Greek) is also very near. I can point to a thousand things like that the star named "wormwood" in Revelation 8:11 is "chernobyl" in the Ukrainian language or how all of the nations predicted to align in the last days are now aligned, but all you have to do is look at the adoration of the world over Barack Obama. He's not the Antichrist, so don't even think it. BUT, it just goes to show you that the secular world will be more than happy having their own lord. The ones who at the very least repel the mention of God in the public square are the most susceptible to bowing to a false one. Obama doesn't have the tenth of the charisma the Antichrist will have and look what he was able to do. The world and the media adore him. The media worked their tails off to elect him and take down anyone that dared get in the way, ala Joe "the plumber". The legislative branches in this country are about to take away freedoms that give voice for the opposition. The chess pieces are most definitely now in place. After Iraq is divided into three (and it will happen), and we send our ambassadors there, be ready to flee to the higher hills. I don't know what will happen but it will make 9/11 pale by comparison. When the Bible says "woe", you better lift up your head and keep those eyes open. God is warning us. That's why it was written. Be prepared and ready. It is coming.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FOR CHRISTIANS AND ENQUIRING MINDS

A link to my Christian blog posts.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »