About Me

Name: Jesse "The Mind"...
Email: jno2179536@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

THE LOST CORRUPTIBLE

Greetings to those who read this. May God open your eyes and ears as you read on. In this wicked generation, too many do not even have willing eyes and ears. People refuse to acknowledge the first part of wisdom, that is to fear God. The ultimate irony is usually people have fear of the unknown. The soul denyers have no fear of what they don't know, but they definitely should. Even forsaking their judgment, they bring onto themselves great treachery before their ultimate arrival. Those with no spiritual center will revolve around anything carrying its own weight. Those with no moral compass will hover around plagues of ambiguity to their own undoing and end. In this era, those carrying their own weight believe they are their own personal god. They go on projecting their self-made gospel which attracts the cult of the spiritual empty. This is no more true than in life in today's world. People become zombie-like followers of the new logic in which right and wrong have no roles to play. It doesn't even have to be an actual person, but an ideology as well. The self-made gods and doctrine then have their own disciples which are willing to sink with the ship blindly headed for the stormiest seas.
 
Most soul denyers are personal geniuses which claim they know everything there is to know under the Sun, but they deny something which is at no distance away from them. They do not ask themselves a simple question: "why do I have a conscience?" Well they do ask silently in the confines of their own mind to which their reply is to then compromise with what their conscience tells them to do. On this destructive journey, the conscience gets whittled down to a splinter. Because it is their soul, they cannot remove it altogether but the voice is merely a shadow in their thoughts. When those ignore their wrongs and their conscience telling them about it, no matter if their view is "the ends justify the means", they will eventually become the lost. That is unless they finally look in that mirror and see themselves honestly for what they've become. Far too many do not. Instead they become the lost. The lost then have become corruptible. A dandelion waiting for someone willing to pull it out of the ground and carry it away without reverence.
 
The splinter that used to be their soul/conscience acts just as a splinter would in their minds and hearts. The person doesn't only not feel good, but right. Instead of looking back to correct their wrongs, they look for ways to cover up the way they feel. The hardheaded would rather continue on their destructive path than admit they're wrong. One of the most sad testimonies of today's world. These people go on a personal quest to do what feels good to counteract what feels bad. They also camoflauge the bad feelings by coming up with cliches which really mean nothing. "Live without regrets". What massive ego must one to have to believe they are above regret? How conceited must a person be to think that people are to be treaded upon without looking down by their feet? There are some who are half-heartedly apologetic, but they reduce people down to be lessons to learn from while not making amends. Still they go on with their chins stridently up and continuing on being what they've turned themselves into, thus proving they've learned nothing. Their flawed logic doesn't come up with the statement that more wrongdoing is much worse than admitting you're wrong and making amends. There is much worse than admitting your wrongs and feeling bad for them. Forgiveness is a powerful tool, which would allow for all parties to move on. The satisfaction of living, learning, and making amends greatly outweighs the guilt one would feel for admitting their sins. This is something anyone with a willing eye and ear will easily understand.
 
This life is a short one, and at any time either you or the person you've wronged can be taken away. Without a moment's notice, your last impression left on a person can be something you'd do anything to take back. Who is willing to allow such a weight on their conscience? The lost who would rather go on as if there's nothing to answer for? Those unwilling to look one second in the mirror to see the questioning eyes looking right back at them? The eyes which ask "what are you doing to me?" Once their life or yours is over, you cannot go back and make amends. You've become a master stonecarver leaving an everlasting impression on them, and ultimately on yourself. You may not be able to make amends, but you will have to answer for your wrongs. Those you've wronged and didn't make amends with will be witnesses testifying in your hearing with the Holy Spirit as their evidence. As is written, fire will test every person's work. Even Christians will have their works tested. Will they offer gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, or stubble? Will you look for those you hovered around and explain to those who've brought their case against you that it's really their fault and not yours? Will you say "I listened to him" or "this ideology"? Will you say "everybody was doing it" or "everybody was like that then"? Will you expect anyone including God to give you a pass for saying these things? If you do, then your "lost" will be forever corrupted. Do not make this your destiny. It's so easy to correct. The price you'll pay is beyond anything you can imagine. God bless everyone of you.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (27) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE ALINSKYITE'S QUEST FOR NATIONAL HUMILITY AND GLOBAL MONOPOLY

During my latest spell due to complications of my illness, God and I had many conversations. He let me know that I know who I am and what I'm here to do. That my interest in politics should only go so far because I know the bigger picture. That I have a different job and it has nothing to do with politics. I've been aware of this for years. So I promised Him that when I write more blogs, they'll at least have a biblical background to what I write. I will not go back on that promise I made Him.
 
This blog is the third part of my series of blogs where I label Obama as the great Alinskyite. This does go right in line with what is written in the Bible or I wouldn't write it. I wasn't sure if I'd ever write anything political again, but I can't hold my tongue any longer. With a beaming eye towards the bigger picture, I can see every step in between now and then. I will trace back the steps of my understanding of the Alinskyite's agenda in this blog. For those who haven't read the first two parts, you can look back. The titles are "Put on the Effin' Glasses" and "Taking Down the Great Alinskyite".
 
As I said in those blogs, Obama is out to grab power unto himself. I laid out his plans along the way so this blog will be about his true ideology. We pretty much know what his ideology is, but I intend to go all the way with it while detailing as much as I possibly can. I will also detail his failure and the unintended consequence late in this blog. All you have to do is look at his associations and get a good idea what his ideology is. Birds of a feather, America. Wake up. Right now, Obama is gathering power unto himself by fully wrecking things that were already injured. Always seemingly having the remedy which absolutely has to be passed before even being read or understood by the American people. Each of his solutions to the problem always magnifies the wounds that already exist. In fact, his intention is not to magnify the wounds but to kill altogether. This way once he's done killing he can institute his real agenda. Once this country has collapsed enough, social justice can begin.
 
Our country was in full crisis mode due to overspending by Bush and the GOP that lost their way after being infected by the Washington Virus too long, as well as the dems puppeteering the housing crisis. Obama was elected to "change" things. He will and has already. When the government spends too much money to weaken the dollar, the "bigger picture" Obama's solution was to spend a whole lot more. In the last year Bush was in office, we were in a $450 billion deficit. Right now as it stands, we are in a $1.8 trillion deficit. Our debt was already astronomical before Obama came in. It was around $10 trillion. In four years it will be nearly double that. Obama had to pass that stimulus package by saying it was a huge emergency and blamed the prior administration, which still had a bad taste in the American populace's mouth. There could be no waiting. They had to pass it before ANYONE could read it because it was such a crisis. Now we see that this stimulus not only isn't working (duh), but that most of that money wouldn't be spent in the near future. If we were in such dire crisis, then why is it that months later we have only spent 10% of it thus far? Why haven't there been jobs created? The reason why the stimulus package was passed was to quicken the death of the American economy and ideal. That's why the money really isn't there to create jobs. It's a huge waste to purposefully destroy our economy. It would have been much better to just hand the American people the money directly out of the stimulus bill. I saw in the local news that Illinois had a specific project created out of the stimulus bill. The cost was $4.8 million. The number of jobs on the project- eleven. The true agenda of this stimulus bill and the next one is to kill the American economy. Our strength is the dollar and the economy, as is the case in every country. Weakened money means a weakened country.
 
There is NO WAY we can recover from this spending. You tell me how we can pay back nearly $20 trillion. I'll give you a hundred years and give me a solution that would have us become stable again. You can't do it. No one can. Then take into account further economic catastrophies that need emergency funding. That need to be passed before the American people can react to it. Further proof is the healthcare bill and the cap&trade bill. By his own administration's words, the proposed healthcare bill will only cover 13 million more people. There are an estimated 50 million people without health insurance, and that's counting illegals. Obama's bill will leave 37 million uncovered by his own administration's mouth. How much will it cost? The bullied CBO (Congressional Budget Office) said a ton, even after Obama "met" with them. So in an economic crisis due to outrageous overspending, Obama's solution is to spend even more and put us even further in debt. In Obama's own words, the prices will "necessarily skyrocket" in a cap and trade system for energy. His own words. As he explained, energy will become much more expensive so companies will have to pass it onto the consumer. Again his own words. With the American people crippled due to job losses and the weakening of the dollar, his solution will again make it worse.
 
Once these things collapse, then he can begin anew. Our pulverized country will be worse off than the Great Depression. He cannot institute social justice without such a collapse. America cannot relinquish its superpower status without such a collapse. The Alinskyite can now begin his agenda. The community organizers and his new band of recruited domestic militants will hold power over the populace to make sure things don't get out of hand, at least in Obama's eyes. The rich will be the victims of horrendous crimes. Obama will stand aside to allow the people with the pitchforks to have their way with those who will be the scapegoats. Again, the Jews will be to blame. They have to be included in any disdainable action when economies crash.
 
For those awaiting the midterms, Obama has foreseen losses and has prepared for them. This is an unwitting, unwilling change by the American people. Unless the GOP has incredible gains in congress, then the midterms will matter not. Obama has already put into place measures that have taken away the power of congress in anticipation of losing the midterms. That's what the czars are there for. Commies and other radicals serve as Obama's czars which do not answer to anyone but the President himself. Only an incredible gain by the GOP will render Obama's czars impotent, therefore Obama himself. Modest or even good gains in congress will not take Obama off his trajectory.
 
The radicals can then write a new constitution, which will have not a national standard of living but a global one. There will be no more sovereignty for the United States of America. Nor for England, France, or any other country in the world. There will be the New World Order, which Obama will intend to be the leader of. He will not be the one. He will fail at his bid to take his "child of the world" a great leap forward to "leader of the world". A new one will arise out of Spain with more charisma than he has. The new one will have new solutions for a new world, and this world will praise him for his way with words and his proposals. He will verify a treaty that will seemingly bring resolution to the everlasting Israeli-Arab tensions in the Middle East. The world will say "we've evolved to a new species. Look what we were able to do with our minds. There will be no more war." Our human instincts will then get the better of us and world war will break out halfway through the seven year peace treaty. The new one will die and will seemingly rise again. The one that used to be called Helel will be on Earth in the flesh. Now his name is Death. His name is the Devil. His name is Satan, and Hell will follow him. So it is written, so shall it be done.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ENTER THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN, BUT NOT EVERLASTING LIFE?

In the "sermon on the mount", Jesus refers to the kingdom of heaven and what it takes to get there. He says that it’s harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. The eye of a needle was actually a nickname for one of the entrances into Jerusalem’s temple walls, but nevertheless he says through God all is possible. That right there should tell people willing to look that there might be a difference between the kingdom of heaven and everlasting life. If one goes to Jesus, rich or not, they will have everlasting life. Nowhere does it say you have to believe upon Jesus to get into the kingdom of heaven. Jesus explains what it takes to get there in the sermon on the mount. Men with their incompetence refused to look into that there was possibly a difference between everlasting life and the kingdom of heaven, even though Jesus did say that heaven and Earth shall pass away. In place there will be a new heaven and a new Earth. Jesus also said in his father's house there are many mansions. That word "mansions" in the original Greek is the word "μονη" (moh-nee), which really means a residence or resting place. Heaven as it stands now is just a temporary holding place for those who've lived their lives honorably, including those who believed in our Messiah. Knowing there is a difference between everlasting life and the kingdom of heaven will answer that question that atheists and doubters love to bring up, “if no one has ever heard of Jesus, why can’t they get into heaven?”

In order to achieve everlasting life, one must go through Jesus. God will not judge against those who are not held accountable for what they don’t know. If they live their lives the way Jesus described in the sermon on the mount, even if they never heard of him, they will get to the kingdom of heaven after their death. There will be a time for them to make that choice in the future, which I will get to later. Those who have lived their lives wickedly will not get into the kingdom of heaven, but at some point in the future can find themselves making the right choice and achieving everlasting life after they have learned their lesson. They are the ones who are called "the dead" in Revelation 20 who live not again until the thousand years are done. Every single time when the term "everlasting life" is mentioned, it talks about believing upon our Lord. So why the difference in what it takes to get to the kingdom of heaven and what it takes to achieve everlasting life? Because it's two different things.

There is another age after this one, as I’ve written many times before. When Jesus returns, as is written in the original Greek, he will end this age. Not the world. In Matthew when it speaks of the end of the world, in each instance that word in the original Greek wasn’t “cosmos”. It was “αιων” (ahee-OWN), which is their word for age. There are times in Matthew when the word “world” is cosmos in the original Greek, but when it speaks of the end of the world, it’s always “αιων”, so there's a reason why he used different words despite the translation of the KJV. Without the knowledge that Jesus' return only ends this age, Revelation 20 cannot be made sense of. Keeping in mind that when Jesus returns he ends this age, go read Revelation 20 again and you will get a very new sense of it. The correct sense I am hoping ;)  

It will be then when those who haven’t made a choice or those who’ve made the wrong choice will have to make it. The ones who made the wrong choice or lived their lives wickedly will not live again until the thousand years are fulfilled. They are called “the dead”. Satan will be loosened from his bottomless pit prison and will try to deceive the world once again. Those he deceives then will lose their last chance at showing their faith to God. Everyone will know the right choice, but as is written even at the end of this age the mystery of God will be finished at the blowing of the seventh trump and still many will fall. It will be the same case at the end of the next and last age.

Now when someone mocks you for your beliefs or genuinely asks you that question about those who never had a chance to choose Jesus as the Christ how they will get to heaven, now you have your answer. Traditional teaching has failed at this probably as much as they’ve failed at anything else about God’s word. It’s amazing how many of them have refused to ask such a simple question, “is there a difference between the kingdom of heaven and everlasting life?” Without ideological blinders, you can now see there truly is a difference between the two.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE ATTACK UPON GOD

The attacks upon God and those who believe in Him are becoming more sharp and mainstream in recent years. What these so-called personal geniuses don’t realize is that they are fulfilling scripture by doing so. I hear these masters of the universe say the darnedest things with such fervor and authority about things they know nothing about. They always have to add that little shot to those who believe, especially Christians, saying that they are uneducated and believe in just an adult Santa Claus myth. Nothing like putting those down that disagree. I don’t mind taking shots or giving them much, but those I give the shots to have cast the first stone.

Atheists are prideful hypocrites who say they are for equal treatment and harmony among all of creation, when in fact they want to be recognized by everyone else as being the great thinkers of our time and never miss an opportunity to try to get under the skin of their Christian coinhabitants. They try as hard as they can to stick out from amongst the crowd with their middle-child syndrome. They especially use Christian holidays to make sure that they are heard. Anyone that says they are insulted or offended at God being referred to in our currency or a nativity scene displayed by a town or city during Christmas season is lying to you. One can’t look at a dollar bill and get irate. One can’t look at people praising someone they believe to be their Saviour and feel like they’ve had their faces spat upon. This is their way of letting you know they are smarter than you because they don’t believe in God. They believe in evolution.

The intellectuals and atheists are big believers in evolution. That is their reason for being. This is their god, whether they like to think of it this way or not. Evolution is their god. The supreme prophet of the Evolution god was Darwin. A prophet who didn’t even believe the theory he proposed himself. With this belief, it allows them to live their life without restriction. Why have restrictions when there is nothing to answer for after their lives are done? This is a benefit for their belief. Possibly even an excuse to not use their own willpower to do things their conscience tells them not to do. “If there’s no God, I don’t have to listen to my conscience. My conscience is just my mind playing tricks on me, mastered by the society of the feebleminded believers who think certain things are wrong. My conscience does not exist.”

The sad thing is that their belief in evolution has questions that they can’t answer themselves. I used to frustrate fifty year old adults when I was a teenager before I even read the Bible with my questions to them. I would ask them questions like “if evolution is real, then how come there are still cockroaches?” The best answer I got was “well some evolved and some didn’t.” I thought evolution was constant. Why would some of the species evolve but some not? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. There should not be dogs, birds, fish, mosquitos, or bears. If evolution really exists, then there should be at the most only a few species below us on Earth right now. Evolution is evolved. Evolved is evolution. Another question I asked was “if the Earth is four billion years old, is that enough time for an amoeba to make it all the way to a human considering there are well over a million different types of insect alone?” Seeing years of things they perceived to be facts erode on their faces was pretty sad to see. They didn’t like me much, those intellectuals, but they knew I was no fool. I heard one say “well there are different classes of species and that’s how it happened”. Well, how did they divide into those classes? What decision making ability was there to say “I’m going to turn into this now”? If a species adapts to that climate or environment, how do they change themselves? What creature was the first that said “I need a digestive system so I can nourish myself and excrete waste”, and then do it? If the first species to have nourishment from eating ate, they would die without a way to excrete the waste. That would be the end of that new species. For those who claim they are supergeniuses to the Nth degree, these questions they have not asked themselves doesn’t speak well of their thinking ability. Maybe they do think of those questions, but since this is their belief and it’s not in God, they’d rather just let it rest there and not wonder about things they don’t have the answers to. Willingly blinding themselves from their own accusation upon those they disagree, that Christians cannot think for themselves. Evolution is proof they cannot think very well. The true intellectual is the true fool. Even Bill Maher, who never fails to insult Christians, believes in evolution but admits something must have happened to get life started. DUH! Albert Einstein is known as maybe the smartest man in the last century, and he believed in God. He even went as far as to say that if anyone can look into the dark reaches of space and the glorious nature on Earth, and not realize there was a God to create it all is blind.

A favorite attack of these atheists and intellectuals upon those that believe in God say that there have been more people killed in the name of religion than anything else combined. Hogwash. Religion is just an excuse. Racism is at the crux of the matter when it comes to killing by the masses. Racism is the true reason. Religion, no matter what religion it is, is always the excuse. Before there were Irish Catholics and Protestants fighting eachother, there were the red and black Irish fighting. Before there were Sunni and Shiite, there were Arabs and Persians fighting. Look up your history. I know, again this is too easy to come up with, which reiterates my point that the true intellectual is the true fool.

Atheists say “how can you believe in something you can’t see?” I believe in love, but I’ve never seen love. I see the evidence of love everywhere, just as I see the evidence of God everywhere. Love cannot be seen by anyone. I know many atheists say that the Judeo-Christian God is invisible, like it’s written that He is somewhere in the Bible. Actually Moses saw God, but only from behind as God walked into the sanctuary as Moses and the Israelites roamed through the wilderness. Moses was not allowed to see God’s face, but he saw Him. Nowhere does it say God is invisible.

If an atheist is truly enquiring, then it’s good to talk about things of God. If you know things pretty assuringly, then speak with some authority. If you’re a product of traditional teaching, then I don’t suggest doing this because I can ask questions about your belief you cannot answer as well. This world is NOT seven thousand years old. Dinosaurs truly existed many thousands of years ago. Don’t let any traditional teacher fool you in stating otherwise. If an atheist is there to just rile you up and get under your skin by belittling what you believe in, then don’t cast your pearls. If they cannot admit the existence of their own conscience which is at no distance away from them, they aren’t ready to hear of the Truth far above their heads. God bless.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »