About Me

Name: Jesse "The Mind"...
Email: jno2179536@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

MY LATEST COMMENT TO AL GORE

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Monday, November 23, 2009 4:17:00 AM
Some of you know that I've been in contact with Al Gore at his global warming website. I even sent the link to Crawfish and had him post it on his page. Some of you contacted ole Al and some even had their musings erased. WHO WOULD DO SUCH A THING?! GASP! Anyway, it had been a while since I wrote Al back because my last comment was also erased. WHO WOULD DO SUCH A TH... ah nevermind. Had to be done by Al or a sycophant who's nose is splintered all to hell. He is pretty wooden, you know. "Me Al, Big tree!" I decided to contact him because of the newest scandal involving the global warming scientific community. What? You didn't hear about this in the mainstream media. The hell you say? Well don't worry, "The Mind" will fill you in. It seems that a hacker hacked into the head of Britain's top Climatology Research Unit, Phil Jones. Now this isn't some made up thing like manmade climate change. Jones and Hadley University's CRU head said the emails seem to be authentic. What did these emails say and who were they sent to? Well the emails revealed that these manmade climate change proponent scientists were cooking the books by hiding and tricking data so the stats would show the Earth is still warming. "The hell you say?!" Ohhh, I say. The emails were sent to many of these scientists proving collusion in this cooking of the books. There even are requests from Jones to have emails erased by other scientists, which would be illegal, not to mention incredibly scummy. Why would they need to cook the books? Well, I just had to ask my old pal, Al.
 
"Gee, Al. Why is it you keep avoiding to debate scientists that want challenge you? You debated Ross Perot on Larry King on the importance of NAFTA. He was proven right even though all he said was jobs would be lost. He may have had a comical performance and you won the debate, but he was proven right. Isn’t manmade global warming a more important issue? I mean, we’re talking about the end of all life on Earth! You told a scientist you can’t debate the science of manmade global warming….oops I mean climate change. It was nice of you to call those that don’t believe you “flat-Earthers”. It was very endearing for you to complain to media outlets saying that people with opposing views shouldn’t be given equal airtime. Damn democracy, eh? It was especially sweet of you to tell children to not to listen to their parents when it comes to manmade climate change. Funny how you dems keep harping about free speech, but yet you’re the ones trying to silence the voice of the opposition. Obama sending his minions out to other media networks saying “don’t you be like Fox and ask questions we don’t want to answer”. David Plouffe and Anita Dunn admitting that they told the media what to print and what not to print during the campaign. Wonder why they listened, by the way. Obama’s former auto czar threatening investors in Chrysler that if they didn’t take the 19 cents on the dollar the gov. was offering that they’d unleash the full power of the White House press corps. How does he know the press corps would do his bidding? Oh wait, Palin, Joe “the Plumber”, and anyone or anything that dares make Obama look bad. Then there were the government investigations being done on healthcare providers to seniors for daring to send their customers information that was also found in CBO reports. Not to mention your “don’t give them equal airtime… there’s money to be made and people to enslave”. Of course, I’m just quoting what you thought and not what you actually said.
Back to this global warming thing. How is it that I keep being proven right about these temperatures? I don’t mean the adjusted ones by the government-backed scientific community. I mean actual “damn it’s cold” temperatures. For anyone that wishes to look, you can look up at my comments predicting cold winters and summers. Chicago had maybe it’s coldest summer on record. New York had its sixth coldest. Then there’s this weird story all over the internet. Some internet hacker hacked into the email account of Britain’s head of their top Climate Research Unit, Phil Jones where Jones and the CRU admitted the emails were authentic. In these emails there was collusion with other top global warming proponent scientists to trick and hide data to make it seem like the Earth is still getting warmer. Gee, why would they do that Al? Governments routinely funding scientists that go along with the “manmade climate change” scam while defunding scientists that don’t. Why Obama’s cap and trade plan “would necessarily cause energy prices to skyrocket… and those costs would be passed onto the consumer”. His words, not mine. Why would he want everyday people to pay more for energy in an economy like this over an unproven and contentious issue at best? Why? Don’t tell me it’s not to have more government power over the people. Don’t tell me it’s not to bring about a one-world government. The scam is global, afterall. Say it isn’t so, Al. Well, that’s really the only answer. My flat-Earthing a** against you, the government-funded scientific community, pop culture buffoons, a willing media handing a helping hand, and your side has to cook the books? Gee, looks like this flat-Earther just won."
 
Second new comment: "'Funny how you dems keep harping about free speech, but yet you’re the ones trying to silence the voice of the opposition…” Oops, forgot the oxymoronic titled Employee Free Choice Act where union members would lose the right to a private ballot. Gotta make sure no members actually make use of the Constitution and their right to free speech. Imagine how one would be ostricized (at best) if they voted against union hierarchy in an open forum. I guess that’s freedom of speech in the world of the liberals/grown up hippies. Free speech as long as you like it. If not, then you’ll ostricize, humiliate (loved Obama’s guide, Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules For Radicals”), shout down, shut down those that dare speak their own mind. Man you guys are scum."
 
I just couldn't resist contacting him again, you know? I'm a bad, bad boy and I hadtuh do it. "Damn Jesse 'The Mind' and his use of the cerebral cortex. Damn him to Hell!" You all should give Al a ring as well. Tell him how much you love him. Show him you care. Let your smile be his umbrella in these dark times. The link to his site is just below. All you need to do is click and type. Bless his oak heart.
 
 
** UPDATE**
I posted this link on my last blog to a video series on Youtube that the BBC originally made. It's called "The Great Global Warming Swindle". The scientists in it speak about how their anti views of manmade climate change caused them to be defunded, ostricized, and misquoted in studies. The hacker story definitely lends these scientists credence of their complaints, which I'm sure most already knew. Now there is plain as day evidence. The video is in nine parts on Youtube. The first part is below.
 
 
A mock interview I did with Al Gore. Very funny. A must read if you're into this stuff : )
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GLOBAL WARMING AND THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT *UPDATED*

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Friday, November 06, 2009 12:00:00 AM

I have written in the past at other websites about global warming and other political issues, but now I realize that politics isn’t my fight. Getting people prepared for the time to come and explaining God’s word without the entanglements of traditional and denominational teaching is my fight. The political fight will rage on without me. This post does entail global warming because of its agenda of being a global government. With the global government comes with loss of sovereignty. Loss of sovereignty comes with a loss of freedom. Loss of freedom comes with a loss of humanity. Loss of humanity comes with things that should never be heard or seen.

When I was young, scientists said we were either in or about to enter an ice age. As a matter of fact, many including Obama’s climate czar said by the mid 90’s the northern hemisphere would be mostly covered in ice. Since I’m not ancient, this happened not long ago. If memory serves me correctly, the ice age hysteria lingered until 1980. The reason for the cooler weather was lack of sunspot activity. In 1988, the UN came out saying there was global warming. Soon after that, man was to blame. Instead of scientists learning their lesson after the ice age fiasco, they screamed like Chicken Little again and proclaimed the Earth was melting. For anyone with a curious mind, one must be able to ask how can man cause the scientists to go from the talk of ice age to global warming within a decade? That’s impossible, isn’t it? How can our creation cause such a drastic turnaround within ten years? A question global warming hysterics either won’t ask, or don’t want you to ask.

The Earth was warming during the 80’s and 90’s, but the last few years the Earth has been cooling. Look it up. Don’t look at projections which are outdated. Look at actual stats. Heck, put your finger to the air and feel. It feels cooler than it was about ten years ago, doesn’t it? The last few years, it has gotten particularly cooler. The reason: lack of sunspot activity. During the Earth’s warming, we weren’t alone. Mars too was warming at about the same rate since the 70’s. There will be a link below to that story. If lack of sunspot activity was the cause for the cooling back in the 70’s and again now, and when our planet warmed along with another planet, couldn’t anyone with a rational thought conclude that it was an increase in sunspot activity that caused the warming?

What started off as an innocent but headline grabbing proclamation that the Earth was warming, governments saw it as a chance to grab more control over their people. In turn, they would give scientists grants to keep going along with the hysteria while ostricizing any dissenting voices. This is worldwide. Scientists are routinely ostricized, threatened, and even misquoted in studies if they dare go against the "man causing climate change" religion, as was shown in "The Great Global Warming Swindle" on Sundance. Yes, Sundance actually showed it. Here, Al Gore took up the cause while making a lot of money from it. When anyone actually challenges him, he dismisses them. He actually told a scientist that wanted to debate him that he can’t debate the science. Imagine that, Gore telling a scientist that he couldn’t debate the science. I guess you are right, Mr. Gore. You cannot debate the science with a scientist. He also has taken on a strategy of humiliating his opponents by insulting or trying to minimize the voice of regular people. He has called anyone that doesn’t believe in manmade climate change “a flat-earther”. He has complained to media that people who don’t believe in manmade climate change should not be given equal airtime. He has even told students to not listen to their parents when it comes to the talk of manmade climate change. Yes, he said that. Of course they changed the term “global warming” to “climate change” since it is getting cooler, but with the same agenda. It’s as if the Earth never changed temperatures before. According to any scientist, the Earth has gone through much more drastic changes in climate than what we’ve been going through lately. Were the Romans responsible for global warming by making metal for shields?

The whole reason for the government wanting climate change legislation is for power. Former czar Van Jones did a speech saying green jobs was a way to spread the wealth. You can find that on Youtube with no problem I’m sure. There is a link below to an audio clip of him saying this. Still, that is not the purpose for climate change legislation. Any program such as healthcare, bailouts, or green legislation is for the government to increase in power. Last year when Bush was still in office, Henry Paulson twisted the arms of banks that didn’t want to take government money in that TARP bill to take it. That is according to many bank officials themselves. The government wanted their fingers in that money. Obama has taken it a step further. Obama reluctantly let the banks pay back the TARP money but put a clause that if the government felt troubled by our financial institutions that the government would again take control over them to prevent a crisis. The government does not want to keep their hands out of that cookie jar. That is just one bill. What about cap and trade? Obama spoke about his cap and trade program where he said, and I quote “energy prices would NECESSARILY skyrocket… and the energy companies would then pass that onto the consumer.” I have a link below to this as well so you can see him saying it yourself. With our economy in utter shambles right now, why would he want to cause us to pay more over an unproven and contentious issue at best? Redistribution of wealth or the growing of government and world governments coming together? You make the call.

This is a history lesson for the future. Whenever governments try to “spread the wealth”, it is only a mantra that would cause the masses to flock to their cause. In no case ever in any other government in the world’s history was wealth ever spread. In every case in any other government in the world’s history the poor stayed poor and the rich stayed rich because the rich played ball with the government. They got behind the government’s quest for power so they kept their money. As a matter of fact, in every case the amount of poor people rose in those countries. Poverty grew in every case. The ONLY "intended" outcome was more government power. This is the true agenda behind this thing we call global warming. Don’t gloss over that word “global” either. Global government is where we are headed. Combatting climate change is the easiest way to bring this together.

It would seem that someone might point out that no socialist government eradicated poverty. Since the impoverished grew along with the government, the people had less power. A bigger government then becomes a fascist government eager to squash voices of dissent. You can’t question an overbearing government and get away with it. If you have your ear pointed the right way, you can hear that happening in our very own country right now. Actually, if you can't hear it you might want to listen to Lee Majors and get a hearing aid.

Man causing global warming is a scam, and it’s intent is not to spread the wealth. It is to make government bigger and stronger,  since there is no example of a government spreading the wealth in human history. It would be better if the government took the money of the rich and directly handed it to the poor. That’s still wrong, but that would be better than grabbing the money and making programs intent on wasting the money away since the waste goes in their pockets. That's right. Either they or the ones that back them get the money that is wasted. Where do you think the money goes? Your money. You’ve been had if you believed the government was truly trying to combat climate change. It can’t be done. Unless we blow up the Sun, we cannot combat climate change. It has happened in the Earth’s history over and over again. You’ve been had if you think the government had an innocent agenda. Power is a snowball rolling down a hill. It only gets bigger over time. And since it's "global" warming, the scam is also global.

What does the Bible teach? Global government and people being delivered to their deaths for their beliefs. It also does say that a vial will be poured upon the Sun which would make the Earth feel very warm. That will happen in the not too distant future. We have been cooling. We will soon be warming. Maybe then the government will convince enough people that something must be done to combat the warming. Even though nothing can be done, the governments of the world will not be able to squander that opportunity.

The Great Global Warming Swindle is on Youtube in 9 parts. The first part is in a link below. Very eyeopening. 


YouTube - The Great Global Warming Swindle, part 1 of 9

Breitbart.tv » Obama Czar’s SHOCK ADMISSION: ‘Green Jobs’ Goal is ‘Complete Revolution’ Away From ‘Gray Capitalism’

Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says

YouTube – Obama: My Plan Makes Electricity Rates Skyrocket

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MY MESSAGE SENT TO AL GORE'S WEBSITE

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:28:00 AM
If you have read Craw's weekly posts here at TH in the past, then you might have noticed at the bottom a credit to me for pointing out Al Gore's website that people are allowed to give messages to him about climate change. I have left a few beauts in the past and was hoping some here at TH would also do the same. I have read of a few, so it's good that some of you spoke up. I think many more of you should write Gore, considering he's called us "flat-Earthers" for not believing that man was turning Earth into kindlin. I will leave a link to his website at the bottom of this post. Write him and tell him what you think of him. Below is the latest comment I have submitted to him at this website:

 
"Hey Al, good call on us melting again. 2008 was one of the coldest winters on record in the northern hemisphere. 2009 was just as cold, if not colder than 2008. That’s two very cold winters due to a lack of sunspot activity. I know you’re going to say these are isolated incidents, but I’ll challenge you with this prediction. The 2009-10 winter season will also be colder than average. Wanna take that bet? I’ll have it here on record that I predicted the 09-10 winter season will be cold. If I’m wrong, then you and your lemmings can point it out to me. If I’m right, then three winters in a row of cold temperatures can’t be called isolated anymore. Want to take that challenge?
 
 I’m just waiting until the scientists start admitting man causing global warming isn’t here anymore (really never existed, but they won’t admit that… neither will you), but to look out for an ice age. Just like they did in the 70s. Do your lemmings know that scientists said that we were in or about to enter an ice age in the 70s, and that they were predicting much of the northern hemisphere was going to be covered by ice by the late 1990s? I bet they don’t. Some point soon, scientists are again going to predict we are in or about to enter an ice age. Are you going to fall for it again, Al? Or will you look at it as a way to make more money? You can fly all over the world in polar bear fur coats and alpaca hats telling the world these crazy Chicken Little stories that the sky is falling because of the ice age coming. As I said, you have my prediction on record. As a flat-Earther, I expect an apology after it’s conclusively proven that I was right and you were wrong. By the way, you really should have given that Nobel money to Irena Sendler. She deserved it a lot more than you did."
 
As you can see, I was succinct but took him to task. I think all of you should also write Mr. Gore and flood his site with opposing voices. There is one comment from a guy who said he's doing something about climate change, so he got snipped. That way, he won't have children that will harm the Earth. Of course I had to comment after that saying maybe him getting snipped was a good idea so it stops that gene pool. You should really read some of these comments from these delusional lemmings. Some will undoubtedly make you laugh and shake your head. It's definitely good for entertainment. Write Mr. Gore, and let those people around the world know that Al doesn't know Jack!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (24) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

JOIN AL GORE'S "FLAT-EARTHER" CLUB

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Saturday, January 17, 2009 6:38:00 PM

I am the founder of this imaginary club. I invite you all to join in. You see, a year ago Gore in an interview said that those who didn't believe that man was causing global warming were like "flat-Earthers". People that obviously from his point of view aren't intelligent enough to see the evidence that can only point one way. That man is causing global warming. Gore said something in his debate against Bush that totally flies in the face of his attitude now. "Let's not talk about things that divide us. Let's talk about things that bring us together." I would say calling those that you disagree with "flat-Earthers" as being divisive. I don't know, call me an idiot. He even went as far to say that the media should not be giving time to people who don't believe that man is causing global warming with their moronic opinions. He didn't say "moronic opinions", but I guess he didn't have to since "flat-Earthers" is enough.

Today we had a high of 20 degrees in the Chicago area. Not too bad. Cold, but not horrible. Actually it was damn near tropic compared to the previous days. We had blizzard conditions Wednesday. Thursday we had a high of -2, and that was at midnight. In the afternoon it was -8 farenheit. The low that next night was -23. Wind chill was -38. We've had a very cold fall/winter so far. We've exceeded already the snowfall amount of a normal full winter. This coming on the heels of last winter, which also was very cold. Last year, according to some statistics, was the coldest collective winter in the northern hemisphere in a hundred years. The cold killed tons upon tons of tropical fish around southeast Asia. This winter so far has been colder than last. Earlier this winter there was record snowfall in Las Vegas, New Orleans, and many other parts of the country that usually don't experience much of a winter. All of this going on and Mr. Gore is nowhere to be found. Maybe I'll invent a new game called "Where's Algo".

 
Last year, some global warming hysteria scientists blamed the cold on La Nina. That wasn't the real cause, but they have so much invested in propogandizing their delusion that they had to blame it on something other than the real cause. You can look back at my blogs of last year and see that I predicted this winter would also be very cold. Why? Because of a drop in sunspot activity. There is a twelve year cycle that much of us know about the Sun, but I believe strongly that there is another cycle that is yet to be discovered. There was no La Nina this year, so scientists can't blame the cold on that now. During the 60's and 70's, Earth was experiencing colder weather. Scientists back then, desperate to be in the news, said we were in or about to enter an ice age. The ice age hysteria was the consensus amongst scientist, just like man causing global warming has been in the most recent years. The reason for the cooling back then, scientists admitted was a lack of sunspot activity. During those decades of cooler and warmer weather, there was still the 12 year cycle going on. There must be another cycle. I will predict next year will also be a cooler than average one. We will most likely have another cold winter for 2009-10. Since the 60s and 70s were cooler because of sunspot activity and the last two winters have been cold because of a lack of sunspot activity, couldn't any moron conclude that the warming of the 90s and much of this decade was caused by an INCREASE of sunspot activity? This is just too damn easy. I guess that's the problem. People who want to think they're smarter than they really are have to complicate things for ego's sake. That would also explain why Mars during the same period of time was actually warming more than Earth, according to NASA. Can man causing the warming on Mars? Gore, Maher, and those other loons might find a way. "Bush is using lasers to warm Mars to cover up the evidence that bombing is causing warming."
 
Last year, I also predicted before the winter got good and heavy that soon scientists were going to again talk about an ice age looming. Lo and behold an Australian scientist that works for NASA said exactly that early in 2008. As I stated in that blog, he's just the first that will jump off the global warming bandwagon and onto the ice age one. Who will listen to them after being so wrong about two major predictions? The same people who thought we were in an ice age back in the 70s. The same people who thought man was turning the Earth into kindlin. In my humorous blog about an interview with Al Gore, he was the last of the global warming hysteria's refugees but had his feet firmly planted into the ice age one. Somehow they will try to put forth that man causing global warming is causing the impending ice age. Their rhetoric will have followers. It will be like an Ice Age Club. With that, and Gore's insulting of all of us who pretty much have been proven right in just two years, I'm starting a Flat-Earther Club. Go ahead and join. All you are suggested to do is write Al Gore. I'll provide a link below. Write him and tell him you love him. Tell him how much you appreciated being insulted by him. Tell him how much you liked him thinking of you as a Geico caveman.
 
Townhall.com - From Jesse 'The Mind' Norman  "MY INTERVIEW WITH AL GORE"  12/28/08
 

Townhall.com - From Jesse 'The Mind' Norman  "IT'S FRIGGIN' COLD!!!"  1/21/08
 
Townhall.com - From Jesse 'The Mind' Norman  "NASA SCIENTIST WARNS OF FUTURE ICE AGE"  4/24/08
 
Al Gore, Global Warming and 2008 » How To Contact Al Gore  You will see I've already paid Mr. Gore a visit : )   Give him hell!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (14) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MY INTERVIEW WITH AL GORE

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:57:00 AM

Only because of my prognosticative abilities am I able to see that in the year 2011 that I will have an interview with former VP Al Gore. The month will be June. The temperature outside will be 46 degrees for a high in Chicago. This will be in the fourth full year of below average temperatures on Earth. Scientists of all kinds finally admit they were wrong about man causing global warming. Not having learned their lessons, scientists are now again claiming we are about to enter an ice age. Just like they did in the 70's. Al Gore comes into the interview with a polar bear fur coat and alpaca hat. This is the entire transcript of the future interview.

 

Me: Welcome, Mr. Gore. Whoa! That's some get up!

Gore: Well, yeah. It's cold outside! The ice age is coming, you know?

Me: Ahh, yeah. Ice age. Anyway, thanks for coming to do this interview.

Gore: The honor is all mine, Mr. Norman. I'm a huge fan even though I disagree with everything you say. (okay, I'm paraphrasing there)

Me: Speaking of ice age. You are one of the last of the global warming hysteria's refugees. What made you finally give up this foolish notion?

Gore: Well, I have to admit I'm pretty hard-headed. I just got back from vacation in Hawaii. Took a private jet. Damn I love those. It was the beginning of June and it snowed. Then I started thinking "hey, this global warming stuff is a fraud." Hey, who knew right?

Me: Actually I did. A lot of us did and yet you called us "flat-Earthers" who should not be given any airtime with our idiotic opinions.

Gore: Let's not talk about things that divide us. Let's talk about things that bring us together.

Me: Well, Mr. Gore, I have to respectfully say I am conducting this interview. You sounded like you were all about division just a few short years ago by calling people with common sense "flat-Earthers". Besides I'm sure you don't want to talk about the past since you have been proven to be so wrong.
 
Gore: Well a lot of people were.
 
Me: True, but you won a Nobel Peace Prize for your work in promoting a false assumption that men, by proxy the United States was burning the Earth like it was kindlin. Don't you think Irena Sendler should have really won that award?
 
Gore: Who's that?
 
Me: Who's that? She was the woman who during WWII smuggled Jewish children in ambulances and gave them to people so they wouldn't be killed. When the Gestapo found out what she was doing, they tortured her. Don't you think she deserved it more?
 
Gore: Damn, yeah I will give that up to you. She did deserve it. That's incredibly brave.
 
Me: Why don't you give her the money you earned from your prize?
 
Gore: No.
 
Me: Didn't think so. Next question is with the newest talk of ice age, when are people like you going to stop listening to these scientists who seem to be hellbent on just trying to stay in the news?
 
Gore: Do you have a degree in science?
 
Me: Do you? No I don't, but I'm not being proven wrong every other decade either over outlandish but presented to be factual predictions. They claimed we were in or about to enter an ice age back in the 70's. They were wrong. In the 90's and much of the first decade of this millennium they claimed men were melting the Earth and causing the extinction of the polar bear. Yet, you come here wearing a fur of one since the UN has made a resolution to kill ten thousand polar bears since their numbers are too high. When are you going to learn?
 
Gore: Well they can't be wrong three times in a row.
 
Me: Why not?
 
Gore: Let's move on to something else.
 
Me: Okay. The war with Israel. Do you think President Obama should have attacked Israel with the advice of his new head of Middle Eastern Affairs, Rashid Khalidi?
 
Gore: Yes, we were provoked. I think President Obama did the right thing.
 
Me: How were we provoked? They're our allies.
 
Gore: Did they have WMD's?
 
Me: Yeah, but they're on our side. They weren't threatening us.
 
Gore: Sure they were. They were about to go to war with Iran, and we can't have that. We need oil from them so we can save our planet from the ice age. Israel was a threat to Iran's oil supply. We need their oil. Forget that stupid wind and hybrid stuff. We need to warm our planet. Global cooling is going to freeze us all. We need to burn more oil.
 
Me: What?!
 
Gore: Don't interrupt me, son. I was on a roll. Speaking of rolls, I'm hungry. Yeah, we need to burn more fossil fuels. We need more forest fires. That's why I'm proposing we assassinate Smokey The Bear. Don't cause forest fires my arse! Light them all on fire!
 
Me: So we should burn all of the fossil fuels to save us from global cooling?
 
Gore: Are you deaf, you flat-Earther?! Yes, burn them while we still can. That's another good thing about bombing Israel. More explosions send the temperatures up.
 
Me: I think I've heard enough from you, Mr. Gore. I tell you one thing though. When you take a side, you definitely jump in with both feet. With your head up your as...
 
Gore: Hey! That's enough! Now I'm going to leave and go turn on every light in my mansion.
 
 
As you can see, Al Gore and others like him will not learn from history. They probably will have a lot of followers where people will really be afraid of an ice age, despite the false predictions from the past. To put it gently, they're loony toons!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'M EFFIN FREEZIN, YOU GLOBAL WARMING LEMMINGS!

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Monday, December 15, 2008 12:20:00 PM

I've been a critic of this global warming hysteria for a long time now. I've had debates with family and friends for years. Until very recently, most of the scientific evidence pointed towards man causing this warming trend. I never denied there was warming, but I was rational in thinking that this was just part of some natural cycle. With recent weather trends and scientific evidence, it seems my contention has conclusively been proven correct.

I stated that thirty years ago scientists were swearing up and down that we were in or entering an ice age. This is a fact. The ice age hysteria was the consensus among scientists. This had some people fearing what to do in the event of an ice age. This was also stated in my arguments to those I debated about man causing global warming. Obviously we weren't in or didn't enter an ice age. I remember former Chicago meteorologist John Coleman for NBC Channel 5 trying to prove on tv that the consensus among scientists was wrong and that we weren't in or about to enter an ice age. He was proven correct. Two years ago he came out of retirement and stated this global warming hysteria is also a myth. Scientists and the media dismissed him saying "who's John Coleman?" I can tell you he was the last accurate weathercaster, and he came out years ago taking on these same scientists and was proven correct. He also founded the Weather Channel. That's who John Coleman is.

In the Midwest we had some of the coldest weather ever recorded last year. Last year in the Chicago area, in less than three weeks we had four cold snaps, each of which dropped the temperatures to around zero for a high. Scientists and people who have invested in this belief that man is causing global warming might say "you can't go just by that. It's just an isolated incident." Is it? Much of Earth had a very cold winter as well. In many areas they had their coldest winter on record. According to statistics, ice in arctic areas were 30% thicker last winter than average and they were at their thickest level since 1979, the year which they started measuring ice at the caps. That's something you will never hear a proponent of the global warming hysteria bring up. As of January 2008, snowfall in the northern hemisphere reached a forty-two year high. The temperatures that winter have been the coldest on average going back before the start of the 20th century. In Vietnam the winter killed cattle and crops. Around the Korean peninsula the cold killed tons upon tons of tropical fish.

 
How is the weather so far this year? It's effin' cold, that's how it is. Right now it is ten degrees. I don't live next door to Sarah Palin either. Ten degrees. It's been very cold this fall and the winter has been predicted to be very cold too. Last year, global warming lemmings said the cold was due to a La Nina, which usually brings about cooler temperatures. What about this year? There was no La Nina this year. Just last year. So why were most people predicting we would have a cold winter this year? I have to say I was the first one, though. And as the first one I will predict next winter to be cold too.

What happened to us being on the road to Meltsville? This isn't an isolated incident. You can't keep on screaming about man causing global warming and then have the coldest winter on record for much of the world. It doesn't add up. So why is it cooling? Why were we warming? Why were we cooling before we were warming? Sorry if that made your head spin. I've said in prior posts that the only thing that can cause us to go from the talk of "ice age" to "we're melting" is the Sun. It's the only LOGICAL explanation. Man can't cause such a drastic change within a decade. It's impossible. In 1979 they were still talking of an ice age. In 1988, the UN came out first saying we were having global warming. That's ten years. That little tidbit doesn't do their delusion any good. And because the scientists and media are so hysterical about this because it gets them in the news, anything to the contrary won't get much attention. That's why it was barely reported that NASA discovered Mars was warming even more than Earth in the same period of time a couple of years ago. Gee, can man cause warming on Mars too? How does man, the United States by proxy, get the blame for warming Mars? How does Mars warm even more than Earth? The same reason why I predicted last winter we would have a cold winter this year. The same reason why I'm predicting next year will have a cold winter too. Lack of sunspot activity. Some scientists are now starting to realize that this is going to cause a cooling trend. This was also the explanation of why we had a cooling trend in the 60s and 70s. So if there was a lack of sunspot activity in the 60s and 70s and we had cooler weather, and there is a lack of sunspot activity now causing the cold this year, couldn't any idiot conclude that an increase of sunspot activity caused the damn warming the last twenty years? MAN! That's just too damn easy!

Will scientists give up on the man causing global warming hysteria? Nope. They have too much invested into it. They were proven to be idiots in the 70s and 80s. They can't afford to be proven to be idiots again. Who would listen to them again? I'll tell you who... Al Gore and Bill Maher and people like them. The same people who accuse Christians of being lemmings to their church are lemmings to the scientific community. It doesn't matter what these scientists say, these people will claim it to be the law of the land. And if you don't agree with them, then you're a stupid person who's just not as educated as they are. That's what Bill Maher says all of the time. You have to be stupid to not believe that man is causing global warming. I guess I'm stupid then. I'm also right. If I'm stupid, then what does that make Bill Maher? Uberstupid I guess. Al Gore said that people who didn't think man was causing global warming shouldn't even be heard with their views. Pathetic. He even called us "flat-earthers" on 60 Minutes. Well, this is two cold winters in a row Mr. Gore.

With a lack of sunspot activity probably continuing for the time being, you can bet your bottom dollar that if the scientists again said we were in an ice age that people like Bill Maher and Al Gore would believe them. And if you don't, they'll again call you stupid. It doesn't matter to them if you're proven right or not. Your supposed "lack of education" in their eyes keeps them from giving you credit for having the same sized brain as they have. What egos! If there indeed is a continued cooling trend, scientists will have to give up on this man causing warming hysteria at some point. They won't go down without a fight though. They will continue to say these are isolated incidents no matter how diverse the findings are. Actually last winter a NASA scientist said to forget about global warming, beware of an ice age looming. They just can't help themselves. He was the first to jump off that bandwagon and onto the next one. Others will follow when it becomes clear to them that we are no longer melting.

I guess since we're flat-Earthers, Gore must be Christopher Columbus. I want Christopher Columbus interviewed three years from now when this cooler weather continues. Sunspot activity doesn't just shut off and on, so it will be here a while. Probably a couple of decades just like the last time. I want this jerk interviewed telling me that I'm still a "flat-Earther" after we've had a few years of cold weather. I want him to explain why the drop in temperature. Please don't die Mr. Gore. I want you to stick around and explain to me why you insulted me but yet I was proven right. Please eat healthy. Take care of yourself. You're getting a bit chunky there again, Al. Your weight is fluctuating like Oprah. Go on that NutriSystem diet. You can eat man food like pizza, burgers, and pot roast with the help of their glycemic index technology. Buckle up. Drive a Volvo, the safest automobile on Earth. Jog regularly. Take your vitamins and say your prayers. I want you here to eat crow in a few years. Tell everyone why you were wrong and that flat-Earther people like me were right. Eat that heaping helping of humble pie. I will be proven right, Mr. Columbus.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (29) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT I HATE! PT. 3

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Friday, December 05, 2008 11:37:00 PM
I hate ideologues. Mostly from the left wing, but I hate them all. The right-wing ideologues for the most part at least err in favor of the very own country they live in. Of course you have skinheads, KKK, militias, and jokes like that. No one can take them seriously. Hate to dash those people's hopes, but the South shall NOT rise again. The only reason why they have any existence in the media is when they march and people come protesting. I wish those protestors would just stay home and let them march alone. If nobody was around when they marched, including media... well they'd quit marching unless they're even dumber than I'm giving them credit for. The left-wing ideologues though have a lot of power and steam. Their stupidity isn't any lower or higher than those of the KKK or skinheads. Matter of fact they probably agree about more things than they care to think about or certainly admit. Maybe they should get married. They both hate jews. They both think America is a horrible country. They both think "the government" is after them. There isn't a lick of sense among any of them. Everything is a conspiracy. They think Israel shouldn't exist. They huddle in their own masses. Damn, they're one in the same! The "idiotlogues" on the left hate President Bush. That is their reason for being. They live to hate Bush. They wake up in the morning and before they even get themselves together kneejerk out a "I hate Bush!" Not sure what they're going to do for the next four years. You all heard them say "Bush stole the election in Florida". Yeah, he sure did. He made Al Gore look like a complete idiot during the whole campaign. It wasn't Al on his own. Get a grip. Bush didn't win or steal the election, Gore lost it. In the recount fiasco, Gore only wanted to recount in counties he was strong in. He wanted to throw the military absentee ballot vote out. That's mighty patriotic of you, Al. Here's another headline that the MSM didn't headline, they did count those votes. The media went there and counted all of those hanging chad votes and guess what happened? Bush increased his lead. That's right. Look it up. And you know the media was trying as hard as they could to make sure Al got the benefit of the doubt, whether the reason be they lean left or it would have been a huge story if the recount went in Al's favor. It didn't go in Al's favor.

 
Now Al Gore is a left-wing ideologue. He went 'coo-koo' for cocoa puffs. I mean spastic nuts. He was yelling at the top of his lungs "President Bush betrayed America!!!" Oh yeah Al? Please tell me what you were doing during the '96 campaign in a buddhist temple (buddhists take an oath of poverty mind you) taking money from officials in the Chinese government? His exact words... "it wasn't a fundraiser, I was there to raise funds" and not to be outdone is this quote "I wasn't there when the money was exchanged. I was in the bathroom". Well Al, why were you in the bathroom when the money was exchanged if you were there to raise funds? The first quote he says so casually innocent like "ehh so I took money for the DNC (democratic national committee) from a communist government who is by far from being friendly with us in a buddhist temple. What's the big deal?" I would call that betraying America, Al. Before he starts his next rant, remember buddhist temple. Bush during the debates in '00 should have just said "buddhist temple" and he would have won by a landslide. President Clinton took in a Chinese spy named John Huang and gave him top secret security clearance without any kind of background checks by the FBI or CIA as ordered by former head of DNC and then Commerce Secretary Ron Brown. In the investigation done by the CIA and Congress they found a 4 year plot that included Chinese agents taking advantage of lax security to get routine access for friends and associates to the highest levels of the administration, including the Oval Office. Huang met in the White House 70 times and in the Oval Office 10 times. The crux of these meetings was for the Chinese government to donate millions of dollars to Clinton and the DNC in return of retaining "most favored nation" status and trade deals. Most favored nation status meant billions of dollars to Beijing. Because of Clinton's greed, Chinese spies took more than what was put on the table. They infiltrated our top security secrets that dealt with US trade. The Chinese had advanced knowledge of America's negotiating positions in trade and economic talks as well as access to trade deals subsidized by America. Ron Brown died in a plane crash and then subsequently took the blame post mortem by administration officials. This story wasn't taken off some right-wing rag. This story was reported by the London Sunday Times. Now all of this is pertinent because of one question... Al, didn't you and Clinton betray America?
 
Ok he's done. Moving on to other idiotlogues. Left wing ideologues claim Bush lied to America over the weapons of mass destruction debacle in Iraq. They said since there were no weapons of mass destruction found (actually 500 cannisters of chemical weapons were found) that he lied about why we went to war. That's the biggest reason why Gore claimed Bush betrayed America. Gore's boss President Clinton knew from intelligence that Hussein had WMD's. England, Germany, Russia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia all had intelligence saying Saddam had WMD's. FRANCE EVEN SAID there were WMD's. FRANCE! This is going to be fun. I'm going to put you in charge of the United States. You are President John/Jane Doe. You just recently had 9/11 happen. We can't go on just as we have I'm sure you would admit after that. Everybody is telling you the weapons are there, including every international intelligence agency. You know the person who supposedly has these weapons has used them before. You know he hates America. You know he gives $20,000 to families of palestinian suicide bombers in Israel. You know he tried to assassinate a former President (former Pres. Bush). You know Zarqawi is in Baghdad. You know those comic book characters, Dr. Germ and Mrs. Anthrax are still there. What do you do? Do you let France, Russia, and China continue to make money off the 'oil for food' scandal while letting Iraqis starve in return to keep Hussein in power, or do you take the safety of your own country in mind and deal with Hussein anyway? No doubt the war was waged in a very flawed manner. No doubt Rumsfeld sucked and refused his strategy wasn't working. No doubt we were bogged down, but you, President Doe must make that decision. What do you do? President Norman would take Hussein out. President Norman would also make sure we had enough troops to start with. President Norman would shut the Iraqi border promising to bomb any vehicle trying to come in instead of begging terrorists to come in to fight. President Norman wouldn't have fired the entire Iraqi army either. If all these things were done we might not even be there but for a few thousand troops for backup of the already trained Iraqi army. The decision had to be made though. Just from a human rights point of view, it should have been done. Can't cite the desire to go into places like Darfur for human rights and not do the same about the Iraqi people. They did find those 500 canisters of weapons. They said they weren't weapons grade, but I'm sure none of those people volunteered to have the stuff poured onto their arms. They did find traces of mustard gas in the Tigris right after we took over Baghdad. Abandoned Iraqi army barracks had chemical/biological suits, masks, and cyringes at the ready. Did they think we were going to use them? Uhhh no. Powell at the UN had a taped conversation between an Iraqi general and colonel where the general said the UN inspectors were going to be where the colonel is the next day. Showing they were tipped off by someone (shhhh, it was france... keep it on the downlow). The general told the colonel to make sure everything was hid and clean. What were they hiding? Iraqi playboys? I still believe they had WMD's.
 
Now let's move on to 9/11. I'm sure you heard the big conspiracy gaining steam that Bush and Cheney did it. Right now there is a group of over 550 professors and scholars that say the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition. That the Pentagon was hit by a missile. Here's some questions they don't have the answers to. Where was the control station of the demolition tower? Where were the secondary explosions we would have seen if indeed it was a controlled demolition? Where are the people from Flight 77? Lastly, what in the blue hell are these people smoking? That's not marijuana they're smoking. I think they went straight to drying Ajax and papering that up to toke. These people actually find it comedic that the story is that 19 hijackers did it. They claim there's no concrete evidence Bin Laden was behind it, even though he admitted it and martyred those same 19 people. Maybe they were just picked at random for Bin Laden to praise. I don't think there is concrete evidence that smoking causes lung cancer, is there? Even though it is common sense. If they do, they just supposedly had this concrete evidence not too long ago. Is there concrete evidence there are stars? Maybe those lights are just heavenly fireworks. Maybe the stars are just a Jewish conspiracy where the things that look like stars are actually cameras operated by Israeli intelligence. These people who believe in that manure-filled conspiracy are supposedly smart people. Intellectuals. People who think they can outthink anyone and anything. They hate Bush so much they come up with peyote-laced theories. And heck since they're so smart, if they can think up something with their ginormous brains, it must be fact. Whatever thoughts and stances they come up with are 4 things: anti-American, anti-Israeli, no wiff of common sense (they can outthink common sense remember?), and void of facts anywhere. If you want to argue with an intellectual and win, but don't feel you're very smart, just do one thing and you'll kick their butt.... stick to facts. Know the facts and you'll very quickly frustrate them into calling you racist, stupid, idiotic, or whatever their tantrum allows. What is bad about these people is they have power. They have classes to teach. They have books to write. They have news stories to put on. They have pictionary to play. They are prominent in the democratic party. Michael Moore sat next to former Pres. Jimmy Carter at the '04 Convention. They have power, and a lot of it. One of the worst I heard was from a left-wing radio show host Randi Rhodes say that the London airport terror plot foiled in England wasn't a plot at all. She claimed that Bush called Blair and told Blair to just arrest some muslims and interrupt their summer vacations. Then she asks enthusiastically "how can anyone not see through this?" She must use more than the 10% of her brain that we mental midgets are alotted. I didn't realize how inferior my mind was until I heard her speak. I mean wow. She must have the HAL of brains. This woman must have some power since she had a radio show. Who was paying this super-genius right? They do have power and their purpose issssss.........? I don't know. Other than potentially harming America I have not a clue because it's so insane I can't fathom it. I'm not smart compared to someone capable of using 75% of their brain. Maybe it's just to make America a huge socialist state. Problem is if we become one, our power will go away. Maybe that's it! AHA!!!!! I found the answer! I hope 40 years from now a terrorist attack doesn't happen because (other than the obvious loss of life) I bet Bush and Cheney hatched the plot with the help of those darn Jews in Israel. I'm surprised not one intellectual has yet to come up with this conspiracy: "the Americans secretly funded the Nazis so America would have an excuse to come up with the atom bomb and the Jews were ok with dying by the millions so then they can have their own country". Analyze it. It's anti-American. It's anti-Israeli. It hasn't a drop of common sense. It has no wiff of fact anywhere. It's a true intellectual, left-wing conspiracy. Damn stupid idiots.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

GLOBAL WARMING SKEPTICISM ON THE RISE ... FINALLY

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Monday, November 26, 2007 2:00:00 PM

I've stated in a couple of previous blogs that I don't believe man is the cause for most of the current warming trend of our planet. I stated the reasons why were because Mars was warming faster than Earth according to NASA and that I remember the same scientists 30 years ago were saying we were in an ice age, which we obviously were not. Al Gore is starting to get some criticism by scientists for at the very least exaggerating the effect man has on global warming. Gore has recently said "there is no debate" on whether or not man is the primary cause for warming. The nutty left eh? He actually said opposing voices shouldn't be heard. Really? They shouldn't be heard? Damn, that's cold. Pardon the pun. It's that "free speech as long as they like it" monster that keeps popping up under the beds of the far left. It's also that brainwashing they're trying so hard to do. That's another reason why I don't believe in man causing much of the warming. They really are trying to brainwash people. Why? It's because of what I stated in a previous blog, scientists are dying for the attention that no one paid to them in high school. Al Gore took this global warming issue as his platform like Miss America does with feeding the hungry. Al won't answer this question though, if man is causing global warming then how come Mars is warming even more than our planet? Doubt he's even been asked. Not by the media certainly. Gore is the media darling. He won the Nobel Peace Prize on this issue over a woman (Irena Sendler) who saved Jewish children from the Nazis during WWII and was tortured by the Gestapo after getting caught. Can't reward a Jew-saver since they already rewarded a Jew-killer with the reward in Yasser Arafat.

Retired meteorologist John Coleman recently said that man causing global warming is a myth. For those of you who do not know John Coleman, I'll tell you what I know about him. He worked for Chicago tv stations doing the weather spending at least most of the time with Channel 5 NBC. I used to watch him when I was younger and remember him well. Before meteorologists depended on computers to tell them the weather, Coleman predicted the weather on his own and did it correctly. People in Chicago remember John Coleman because he was the last accurate weatherman ever. I also remember him saying years ago when all the scientists were swearing up and down we were in an ice age said they were wrong. He's already on record taking on these middle-child scientists dying for attention and was proven correct. I bring up John Coleman many times when I talk to people about how he said we weren't in an ice age when most of the other scientists said we were, and that was before his recent comments. I didn't even know he was alive still. It was good he came out and provided a point of view from someone who still has his head on his shoulders and was proven to be correct once before. Should you take his word or the word of scientists who swore up and down 30 years ago we were in an ice age? Hmm... tough one.

There was a poll taken among high school students on whether or not they believe man is the greatest cause for global warming and most said they didn't believe it. It seems that the attempted brainwashing is having a countereffect on people. The more that scientists say there is no debate on whether man is causing global warming, the more skeptical people have become. For good reason too. We were already down this road. I'm not the frozen guy from "Encino Man" because we weren't in an ice age. None of you are icicles either. Florida isn't going to be part of the ocean floor. You won't be living next door to Spongebob Squarepants.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AL GORE WINS NOBEL PEACE PRIZE

Posted by Jesse "The Mind" Norman on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:00:00 AM
62. Entry for October 13, 2007: AL GORE WINS NOBEL PEACE PRIZE magnify

Hooray for Al Gore! You won another award you didn't deserve. Congrats! Al Gore won the Nobel Prize for his work on drawing attention to global warming around the world. I don't know how climate change awareness equates with the Nobel Peace Prize. Plus, the problem is EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT IT ALREADY! Who doesn't know about global warming? A better question I guess would be "who doesn't know that man is causing global warming?" Then I would raise my hand. The UN in 1988 started the talk of global warming with their scientists headed by Rajendra Pachauri (who was also up for the award), so there has been more than enough talk about climate change. Who hasn't heard about it, whether they believe it or not?

In a previous post "18. What I hate! pt. 12" I talk about how I remember when I was a kid the concensus among scientists was that we were in or about to enter an ice age. Since I'm not 70, this happened pretty recently. Within ten years scientists went from ice age to global warming. How does that happen? That can't be man-made. Cars and mills can't make the Earth go from "ice age" to "we're melting" within a decade. I also pointed out something that Al Gore won't point out and certainly has no answer for and that's Mars has been warming at even a higher rate than Earth in recent years. According to NASA, Mars has gone up .65 degrees celsius while Earth has gone up .60 degrees celsius in the same time period. It's true. Look it up. "Man causing global warming" isn't such a foregone conclusion anymore is it? In my personal opinion, the only thing that can cause such warming would be the Sun. Since the Sun heats all of our planets, then maybe the Sun is changing and causing warming of both Mars and Earth. Isn't that a simple reason for global warming on Earth and Mars? Pluto is even warming according to NASA. Now that's an "inconvenient truth" for Al Gore. I also stated in that previous post that I want us to eradicate pollution as much as possible because it's just common sense that we should try as best as we can to keep our air and water clean. Obviously pollution isn't good for you. It's not a dirty vitamin to take. We should all want clean air and a clean Earth. I'm sure 99% of us do.

So you right-wing fascist, Jesse Norman, who do you think should have won the Nobel Peace Prize? Well since you asked, impolitely I might add, the other favorite along with Al Gore, but the one who didn't win should have won. Irena Sendler(pictured above), an elderly Polish woman saved the lives of nearly 2500 Jewish children in Warsaw during WWII from the Nazis. She would sneak the children by the guards in ambulances from the ghettos and would give them to non-Jewish parents for adoption. She risked her life for these children from the Nazis. The Gestapo would later wise up to what she was doing and arrested her. They imprisoned her and tortured her. They broke her legs and feet. Because of her heart and bravery, 2500 hundred jewish children were able to live on to be adults and have children and grandchildren of their own. She's 97 years old. What a wonderful way to celebrate her bravery and the torture she received at the hands of true evil for the sake of Jewish children by giving her a Nobel Peace Prize. But she didn't get it. Al got it. Why did it take so long for Irena Sendler to be nominated in the first place? Only recently has her story come to light. Can you compare what Al Gore has done to Irena Sendler? Has Gore risked his life? Has Gore saved lives? Did Gore face true evil? Obviously not. Maybe it's good Irena Sendler didn't win the Nobel Peace Prize as to not keep company with Yasser Arafat, a person responsible for killing Jews. Yes, Arafat won the Nobel Peace Prize once. I guess the people who vote for the Nobel awards didn't want to be known for irony by giving an award to a person who saved the lives of Jews when it had already given the award to someone who killed Jews.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »